Runaway Entertainment, written by Danny Robins, directed by Matthew Dunster & Gabriel Vega Weissman

Venue Cymru, Llandudno, April 27 – May 2 and on tour nationwide

(3.5 / 5)

2:22, a ghost story or a debate over whether the supernatural is an actual phenomenon?  The premise behind 2:22 a Ghost Story is rich with potential,  a couple with a new baby move into their intended forever home yet while one partner is away, things start to go bump in the night.  On his return, they invite a good friend and her new boyfriend in for dinner and ask them to investigate the sounds which seem to occur at 2:22 in the morning.  Cue the shrieks, flashing lights and blackout.  

The cast do a great job in telling this story, each character has a well defined persona revealing multiple layers as the play develops.  James Bye plays the arch sceptic, Sam, who seeks a scientific explanation behind every event, natural or supposedly supernatural, Shvorne Marks plays the angst filled mother, Jenny, who has a faith based upbringing making her open to the supernatural. Natialie Casey plays Lauren, the old friend who holds more than a candle to Sam tainted with a sense of frustration as he once laughed at her when she told him about a meaningful, perhaps ghostly experience.  Grant Kilburn plays the new boyfriend Ben who is local, working class and seemingly less sophisticated than the others but who believes in the supernatural.  

The set is simple, an open plan kitchen/dinging room that is in the process of being redecorated after they have ripped out several walls to make it open plan.  Have they upset the lingering memories of families who have lived there before and who now return to haunt them?  We are led to believe this is the case, or perhaps the strange noise emanate from some urban foxes who are hugely vociferous, often in a sudden way.  

As the play develops and time draws near to 2.22, the fear that there is something out there trying to get to them grows.  The suspense is built when windows are opened unexpectedly, a teddy bear is moved into the bathroom and is found soaked in white spirit with no apparent logical explanation.  Sam interjects and tries to dampen down these feelings arguing for a rational, logical explanation for these strange goings on.  His arguments are powerful even though he is opposed by the other three.  

It seems the presuppositions Sam holds are that this world is thoroughly materialistic, there is no supernatural and that the universe is filled with chance events that people unite in their minds to find meaning and purpose.  While this viewpoint seems normative in the scientific community, there are alternatives.  Some believe that there is a supernatural world with some power behind it who uses chance to allow the universe to develop.  But being intelligent, the chances are loaded towards complexity and purpose.  Both options among others remain possible.   

Of course we are not allowed to tell others the dramatic nature of the ending, but therein lies a problem.  The play asks us to consider that when people talk about a person who is not there, their recollection becomes so real to them that they believe that they were actually present rather than a memory.  This stretches credibility.  The play also uses a lot of dialogue to explore the issues surrounding the supernatural, but then throws in some random screams to change scenes and to keep people jumpy.  This became tiresome.  

While there are problems with the storyline this does not alter the fact that this remains a watchable, engrossing performance that holds the attention of the audience and gives them a few things to think about in their ensuing sleepless nights waiting for that bump in the night.