Category Archives: Film & TV

Review The Bodyguard, Wales Millennium Centre by Rhys Payne

All images credit Paul Coltas

 out of 5 stars (4.5 / 5)

Before watching ‘The Bodyguard’, at Wales Millennium Centre, Cardiff I was very excited. The songs are many of my favourites and so I knew it would be an enjoyable performance, but this show did not disappoint. At first, I thought it would be similar to Motown in which the songs are great and popular, and people would sing along to, but the narrative is somewhat less important, but I could not have been more wrong. In fact, I would consider ‘The Bodyguard’ as one of the best all-round productions that I have seen. Having some of my ‘guilty pleasure’ songs included in this production was the icing on the cake.  The last time I saw Alexander Burke in a production was in ‘Sister Act,’ which I felt she didn’t suit but this powerful ballad-based character was a lot more suited to Alexander and her singing style.

The production’s opening was a striking shadow-projected scene, which had loud sound effects, which caused audible gasps from the audience. This was a fantastic way to grab audience attention in the first few minutes of the show. It was easy to spot that this scene would be book-ending the whole production and a similar scene would take place at the end of the show. This is the first time, in my experience, that this type of structure is used which made me keep the image in my head to see how the plot would lead to it again in the end. This meant the entire time I was thinking about this opening scene, which was not a distraction in any sense but would be considered an effective opening scene. The opening number however was flawless. The production values of staging, light and pyros was superb and the dancing was incredible. I don’t know if it was intentional, but I instantly drew comparisons of the character ‘Rachel Marron’ both are super successful artists, costumes show similarities to one another and the ‘performance’ of their songs (especially this one) were of the highest quality. However, I believe that this performance topped the Beyoncé performances I have seen live and this number could have easily been a show in itself. It would not have been out of place as a concert/performance in somewhere like the 02 Arena. The one small drawback to this number was, Alexander Burke, who played Rachel Marron, is an incredible singer and actor but her dancing is the weakest of the three (all of which are obviously of a high level but her dancing is not quite as good as the other two) which could be noticed through the big dance numbers such as this one and also during the opening number there was a short scene of dialogue which took place. Due to everything that was happening on the stage (lights, dancers, music etc.) I missed a lot of this dialogue which was clearly not what the directors would have wanted. The bold opening scene and awe-inspiring opening number contrasted each other perfectly and ‘set the scene’ for the rest of the production. This show alternates between these amazing, popular songs and tense dramatic scenes, which the opening sequences set up for the rest of the show beautifully.

Many of the supporting characters in this production were very relatable and believable which is important for productions like this. The young boy who plays Fetcher was an incredible dancer, which was shown in one of the dance rehearsals scenes towards the beginning of the musical. He was amazing and I would say upstaged some of the other dancers. They used the young boy to perform lifts and flips which obviously would have been easier due to the size of the actor. Although, during this scene the character crawled through a table which I believe did not quite fit the rest of the choreography, but this is a minor detail. This character would have primarily involved to provide an ‘awww’ factor as he is the young son of Rachel who gets caught up in the events of the stalker. This did build the sympathy toward Rachel and ‘hatred’ toward the stalker. The stalker (played by Phil Atkinson) was a key character although he is barely on the stage, even when he wasn’t on stage his presence could still be felt. When he was on stage when he is silent and is in almost darkness, which was an extremely effective way to build tension, and it is only in act two that he speaks. The whole presentation (including casting) of this character was perfect and this character-built fear from the audience. Although it was a bit strange that this character spent a lot the time without a top on.

One of the most enjoyable scenes in the whole show was a karaoke scene not because of dramatic staging, of phenomenal singing or whatever it was just a fun scene. It opened with three girls drunkenly singing ‘Where Do Broken Hearts Go’ it was really funny and I felt like I have seen the same scene in real life. A group of girls singing a popular song like that in karaoke while ‘butchering’ the song, but the difference was in this show these actresses were doing it intentionally. This seemed to be a common theme in this production. Later in this scene, Frank Farmer, the bodyguard (played by Benoit Marechal) goes onto karaoke to take on Whitney Houston’s ‘I Will Always Love You’ which I have personally been tempted to do but never have had the guts to due to the power of the song. However, Frank combated this by ‘talking’ the song, which had the whole audience rolling in laughter. Which was really nice to see the softer side of frank. This scene was ended by the iconic song ‘I Have Nothing’ which was beautifully sung by Alexander. Which was obviously sang to and about Frank as we found out they have an attraction between the two of them.

The final scene of this act was in a club. It revolved around Frank and Tony Scibeli, the security guard (played by Craig Berry) protecting Rachel from any potential threats in the club. In this scene the spotlight illuminates the stalker. This meant my eyes were following the stalker’s track around the stage, which only added to the tension and drama. IThis scene looked more like it took place in a nightclub due to the flashing lights and music rather than a normal club but apart from this the scene was well staged and executed.

The beginning of Act Two had a big dance number to the song ‘I’m Every Woman’, which is a song I know very well. The dancers in this scene were excellent and the acrobatics were a spectacle to watch. However, at certain points in the number there were movements that were supposed to be done at the same time and were actually out of time with one another. But I really enjoyed this opening, as its ‘over-the-top ness’ was a perfect way to regain the excitement after the intermission. There was a few people in the audience singing along with the music which I personally find great as it shows they are enjoying the song etc., but I know some people are against this, so this is worth noting.

In one scene the staging changed from a luxurious mansion to a log cabin. I really liked the concept of the staging as a log cabin suggest warmth and safety, which was exactly what it was supposed to do within the story. The contrasts between these two setting also helped shift the focus from Rachel and her fame/money etc. to family. This is added to be a heart-warming rendition of ‘Jesus Loves Me’ between Nicky Marron, Rachel and Fletcher. Fletcher however did struggle with this song as it is a complex rhythm and strange vocals but as he was a child this was somewhat ignored. The lights and effects were continued to be used to make the Stalker actually terrifying as he appears from nowhere at points and disappears quickly after.

Probably the biggest and best number in the entire production is the classic ‘I Will Always Love You.’ This song was kept right until the end to act as an emotional tribute to everything that happened throughout the narrative. As the earlier ‘rendition’ by Frank in karaoke, was comical this final number was show stopping. The staging, costume and lights worked perfectly to add to the emotional nature of the song and Alexander’s vocals were outstanding. She did change some of the vocal trills from the original, which were fantastic. During this song there was a montage projected onto the stage of the Rachel and Frank and their story so far. I found this to be somewhat distracting from the song and could have done without it, but the montage was not a cheesy and unnecessary  it was heartfelt and emotional. After all this happened the entire cast sung ‘I Wanna Dance with Somebody.’ This involved solos from different members of the cast, including the Stalker (which was a nice inclusion in my opinion), dance sequences and ‘party’ lighting. This was when the audience were encouraged to sing and dance. The two songs (I Will Always Love You and I Wanna Dance with Somebody) obviously contrasted each other and helped cement the pairing of drama and fun.

This production was well thought out and planned. Everything from music, lighting, costumes to props used all worked perfectly together, which was really nice to watch. The production aspects of the show were fantastic and one of the best I have seen. Alexander Burke’s portrayal of the iconic role is on par with Whitney’s (which is high praise) and this a show not to miss.

Review Missing Link by Jonathan Evans

 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Laika likes to be grand, go ambitious and portray the unconventional. They latch onto stories about characters that don’t quite fit in and meet other such outsides and plots that take them to unique places. They also are not content with doing what they know they can do, each time they want to be challenged with their craft and artistry in some way. So here is their next feature, Missing Link, a story about an odd pairing if ever there was one and all the other trails and characters they meet along to way for them to reach their goal.

From the
opening, we get a firm understanding of who the main character is and
what kind of adventure we are in for. We open on a footprint of a large
creature, then it wipes to a skinny boot print then the camera glides
above the water of a lake to a little boat, it rises up to a fancy tea
set being poured and then up to the man having it, he complains that
it’s gotten a bit cold. His assistant apologizes but sets things up for
capturing evidence of the Loch Ness Monster. The creature does appear,
with the encouragement of bagpipes, and proceeds to eat the assistant
and dive down, but through some bold adventuring by the gentleman, he
saves his assistant, however, the camera which would have captured proof
of the monster gets smashed.

This gentleman is Sir
Lionel Frost (Hugh Jackman), an explorer of the strange, unique and
often dangerous. Which leads to his latest assistant quitting. While
browsing through his pile of mail he finds one crudely written letter
saying that if they follow their directions then he will find proof of
the legendary Sasquatch.

He goes to the Gentlemen
Explorers Club that is filled with stuffy, pompous, thickly mustached,
or bearded or sideburned old men in black and white suits that gather
around a fireplace and a reminisce about how they shot an animal or
killed some foreign people. They have no interest in granting Frist
membership because he is unconventional and he always failed to bring
back proof of his oddities. So a wager is made, if he can bring back
proof this time then he will be granted membership,

Within
this scene, you can see Laikas talent for not just animation but
comedy. This scene serves as pure exposition, needed to spell out his
motivation and what will be the goals going forward. These scenes are
usually the dullest and slowest parts of any movie unless they are done
right. While these men are standing around talking they really on unique
character movement, visuals and fun inserts of comedy that keep us
looking and listening. This is something essential yet you’d be
surprised at how many movies have these scenes and put nothing unique or
even fun in it to keep you interested.

When he arrives
at the specified location and does indeed find the Sasquatch (Zach
Galifianakis), however, he is most surprised to find out that he is able
to speak, English! Rather well and also that he was the one who wrote
him the letter. The Sasquatch is all alone in the forest, which is being
diminished by trees being cut down, and believes that he has relatives
in the snowy mountains, the yetis! Frost agrees to help him reach his
relatives if he gives him proof of his existence so he can join the
Gentelmens Explorers Club. However the sasquatch needs a name, Frost
suggests Mr. Link which is also humorous because it’s like missing link, the sasquatch doesn’t get it.

Mr.
Link has very little experience with people or interactions of any
kind. He takes things at face value and is very literal so he needs
tuirns of frazes explained to him and if asked to do something he
literally does it. Take one scene when he is passes a rope and a
grappling hook and asked to “Throw this over the wall” he does, all of
it in one go. This is the main type of jokes we get from him and you
eventually get wise to it and they become the weakenst part of the
movie. 

While traveling they realize they’ll need a map
of the Himalayas, luckily Frost knows where to find one. Adelina
Fortnight (Zoe Saldana) has it, her and Frost were a couple years ago
but he was more interested in his adventures and so she married his best
friend. As you would expect his just showing up after not being in
contact after years and only doing so to get a map that her late husband
died for does not go over well. But they desperately need it so they
come back in the night to steal it, she isn’t happy of course but she
also realizes she hasn’t been living her life, so this duo becomes a
trio.

It seems like they went for sheer impressive spectacle with Kubo of the Two Strings and here they want to try out some more subtle things. Not to say that this movie is devoiud of a grand ambition or has scope,
far from it, but they want to get smaller details down. Take one scene
that takes place on a boat, theres a conversation between Frost and
Adelina, it’s goining through some harsh waves so it rocks, while the
conversation unfolds the room itsef is swaying ever so gracefully, so
the characters have to adjust their footing to balance and furniture
slides around, sometimes very slowly others abrubtly. Other times when
they have a camera that moves along with the character and shifts angles
when they change direction. All of this must be discussed, planned,
built, painted and then finally animated, one frame at a time. Or other
times when Mr. Link is standing with the wind hitting him and every
chunk of his fur blows in the wind.

Laika operates as Disney did in the old days. Art challenges the technology, technology informs the art. They constantly embrace and seek out the odd and fascinating. Like Mr. Link himself there is nothing else like this movie, flaws yes, but why be safe if you can be bold and beautiful.

Review Shazam! by Jonathan Evans

 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

What world am I living in? If you wound the clock back to 2012 and say that there’s a new DC cinematic universe coming and Batman and Superman will be the disasters but Wonder Woman, Aquaman, and now Shazam! will be the winners of the bunch, I’d have looked at you like you were bonkers. Yet here we are, a movie about a beloved character from the comics that I’d thought would never get his own movie and if he did it would be forced through that dark or complex filter that DC movies seem to put most of their characters through. I am so happy this is not the case and we’ve got what we got.

Side
note, this character was referred to as “Captain Marvel” for a long
time, but due to legal reasons, it has been changed to Shazam which adds
a whole lot of complications to it. I guess obviously if this movie was
out and Captain Marvel that would lead to a very confused audience, both in the movie theaters and in the comic stores.

The
setting is not of the dark gritty crime-ridden streets of Batman, the
high tech science fiction of Superman, the mythological scale of Wonder
Woman but a realm of magic, as in true fantasy magic, wizards, words,
robes, and staffs. This gives the character and now the movie it’s own
unique tone and personality to distinguish itself amongst its
competition.

Our tale begins on a dark snowy night
where a little boy is in the back of a car and his father is driving and
elder brother is in the front.  The elder brother and father clearly
get along and care very little for him. But suddenly the little boy is
transported to a deep cave with statues and an old man with a long
beard, covered in long robes and holding a staff. This old man is a
wizard (Djimon Housou)
that offers this little boy great power, but the statues (that
represent the seven deadly sins) tempt the boy to take an evil eye, this
was a test and he has failed so he is cast out. Back to his old,
loveless relatives.

We are then taken to years later
and a little boy is at a carnival with his mother, trying to win him a
toy tiger. She can’t win the tiger but does get him a compass. While
walking through the crowd the two get separated, the boy is taken in by
the police and his mother never comes for him, he is alone. Skipping
again to years later, now present day and the boy has grown up a few
years into an early teenager and his name is Bill Batson (Ashner Angel),
he’s been in and out of foster homes for years always looking for his
mother. Now he is in Philadelphia and put into another home. This one of
the Vazquez, who have adopted many foster children. One of which is
Freddy (Zack Dylan Grazer) who requires a crutch to walk but certainly
never lets that get his spirits down. 

Now in the
present, the little boy in the car has grown up to become Dr. Thaddeus
Sivana (Mark Strong). he has been searching for years for a way to get
back into that mysterious realm of the wizard, fortunately for him he
has now found it and takes the dark power for himself, unleashing the
seven deadly sins from captivity and upon the world. So now we have our
villain!

So, in his desperation, Billy Batson is taken to the cave and offered the power f the wizard known as Shazam! The powers are mean
to be bestowed on a person with a pure heart but Billy is simply a good
enough person. So when he speaks the wizards name a bolt of lightning
hits him and he is transformed into a full grown man in his very own
super suit, light up logo, cape and everything.

It
is the casting of Zachary Levi as Shazam that is the cornerstone for
the movie’s success. He is so unashamedly a big kid, from his energy to
his broad expressions you believe that there is a child working this
adult body. 

This movie takes place in the winter and
within the gray streets of a city, but it is the characters clothing
that makes them pop. Each character has their main color, Billy is red,
Freddy is blue, another is purple, another is green and the villain
wears black. This is a color move and a stylized superhero one so
naturally, people are color-coordinated.

So now
that he has been granted the body of an adult and has superpowers what
to do now? Test them out! In a montage set to Queens Don’t Stop Me Now
where Billy along with Freddy test out his new body and see what its
capable of. This sequence is for the audience to learn what powers
Shazam has too as well as a simple serving of fun. These are children
that have been handed these amazing abilities, of course, this is how
they’d go about it.

This movie knows what it wants
to be. It knows that it wants to tell a superhero story from the
perspective of a child that isn’t taking this all too seriously so
neither are the filmmakers. It knows to insert it’s tongue firmly in its
cheek. However, this is probably the movie the be the most emotionally
heavy, some filmmakers believe that dark equals emotional, it does not,
something does not have to be dark it just needs to mean something of
great importance to the characters and for you to be able to connect to
it. If it’s all dark then it’s just unpleasant, but with the right
amount of balancing between colorful and heavy emotional moments, then
you have a truly whole experience.

As a fan of
Superman and Batman, I am saddened by them getting poor treatment
movies, but they have already had their good treatments and left their
cinematic mark. It is time for new characters to get their time in the
sun and for people to learn about their unique mythos and characters. I
wholeheartedly embrace the renaissance of the underdog superheroes
getting the treatment they deserve. This movie is fun, dark, emotional
and well crafted, like an Ablin movie at their peak.
R

Review Pet Sematary by Jonathan Evans

 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Grief is a powerful emotion. It can cause the most crippling loneliness and make us seek out all possible alternatives to fill the gap that is left when a loved one is gone. But what would it take to bring something back and if they do come back, will they ever be the same? This is the main theme running through Pet Sematary, one of Stephen Kings most acclaimed and celebrated works.

Like
nearly all horror movies this opens with a family, in a car, moving to a
new home. There is the father Louis (Jason Clarke), his wife Rachel
(Amy Seimetz), daughter Ellie (Jete Laurence), son Gage (Hugo and Lucas
Lavourie) and cat Church, these are the Creeds. They are moving away
from the city to Maine where life is less busy and simpler. They arrive
at their new home and take it in along with the forest behind it, that
is cut short when a speeding truck rushes pasts them.

One day while walking through the forest they hear a bang of some kind, then they see children walking inline, one has a little drum, they all have masks of animals on and one is pushing a wheelbarrow with a dead dog in it. They follow the children and see that a few trees have a spiral carved into them and they come to a place called “Pet Sematary” where the local children bury their departed pets. This is when we also meet Jud (John Lithgow). An old man that lives in the house next to them, he’s lived around here all his life and knows about some of the ancient traditions and lore of the land. He quickly becomes a friend to the family.

One day Jud needs to have a private word
with Louis, Church has been killed in a road accident. They decided to
keep it from Ellie deciding to tell her that he ran away. They go to
bury him amongst the other pets but Jud says he knows a better place to
bury him. So they climb a wall of trees behind the cemetery, walks
through a swamp and climb up to a hilltop where he tells Louis to bury
Church and mark it with stones. The next day Louis and Rachel tell Ellie
about Church but she says he hasn’t run away, he came back yesterday,
he’s in her closet right now, which indeed he is.

We
learn that, for whatever reason, when you bury something in that hilltop
they come back. There are ancient folklores about a creature called the
Windego and other stories and theories but it doesn’t matter, the cat
has returned, but not the same, more violent. And so begins the whole
macabre affair and the ultimate sentence of the movie “Sometimes dead,
is better.”

This is a world of old, dark trees, where
mist rolls in and things can emerge and disappear within it, where much
is primitive so crosses and signs are held together with knots. it
invokes an ancient, ritualistic atmosphere to the whole movie. But keeps
it’s shaping simple so they are easily recognizable and can become
symbols for the movie.

King wouldn’t be so celebrated
if his work didn’t have some kind of merit. He has produced his share of
goofy or even not very good products but he is still undeniably a man
of talent. He works best when he creates characters with deep emotional
problems and a situation that highlights human insecurities and layers
it with something supernatural. This is such a material.

As an adaptation, I cannot speak for because at the time of writing this I have yet to read the book. However, I don’t believe this is a detriment to my ability to review the movie. A product should be able to stand on its own, a novelisation of a play should be perfectly enjoyable as it is and not have to depend on its source material. This is a complete story as it is, there may be more details in the book and it may, in fact, be the more well crafted and better version of this tale or maybe the movie improves upon it, I don’t know but either way, it doesn’t matter.

Ironically I recently reviewed Us and wrote
about how horror at its best is not like a hatchet but like a scalpel.
Well, I would say that there are moments of shock within this movie and
they did indeed make me jump with fright. This isn’t the worst thing but
it won’t age the movie well, shocks work once and maybe two more times
after initial watching but after that, you know what’s coming and can
prepare yourself for them. What lingers with you in horror movie, or
really just movies in general, is the buildup and the unseen and the
feeling of dread and anticipation before anything happens. This has
those and they rely upon what the characters have said, the sound and
the unseen before something comes out of the dark and goes bang.

This is a horror movie with a chilling concept at its center, some creepy visuals and terrifying moments, other times when it just goes all out and yells at you with something gross on-screen. King fans will either like it or nitpick the way the material was handled. But from the acting to the production, to the sound and even the ideas that fester within you afterward, I say this is a solid piece of work.

Review Mary Queen of Scots by Jonathan Evans

 out of 5 stars (2 / 5)

Two sisters, one is already the Queen of England, the other, younger to be the Queen of Scotland. They could have both ruled peacefully throughout but pride and the manipulation and other greedy men forced conflict and led to the death of one. Mary Queen of Scots tells the story of Queen Mary (Saoirse Ronan), her arrival in Scotland and most of the events that lead to her execution, that wasn’t a spoiler, by the way, its the scene that opens the movie.

Mary’s boat
pulls in on the isle of Scotland and her and her followers set up in a
castle. Greeting her is the Erl of Moray (James McArdle) her half
brother, also there is John Knox (David Tennant) the protestant cleric,
he is against Mary taking up the throne because she is Catholic and
after he makes this very clear and shows her little to no respect she
dismisses him from her court. 

As portraits and
historical accounts tell us Mary was a great beauty and Elizabeth had
harsher features. This is how they play it in the movie but we can
clearly see that Margot Robbie is a very attractive woman in her own
right. Even after she suffers an illness
and has to be caked in heavy gaudy makeup we can still see through that
and know she is beautiful. This is a case of the movie saying one thing
while we can clearly see that this isn’t the case. To Robbie’s credit,
this is a role where she challenges herself and does something
different.  Throughout her career, she has not been content with simply
relying on being one thing. She made her name as a sex bomb in The Wolf of Wall Street, became the bouncing mad Harley Quinn in Suicide Squad, a manic colorful killer in Terminal and a very rough around the edges figure skater in I, Tonya.
She is usually the best thing in whatever movie she’s in even if the
movie is less than stellar. Her she plays the iconic queen that was by
all accounts fastidious and kept composure at all costs, along with her
flawless English accent this is another notch on her impressive and
diverse filmography.

All the actors are very good here.
These are accomplished actors that have to go through multiple moods
within the movie, except for Tennant who is a grumpy bearded man
throughout. They adjust themselves depending on who they are talking to.
Whether they are talking to an equal, someone below them, someone
they’re attracted to or someone who’s trust they are trying to gain and
after they’ve gained it speak to them differently.

For
the historical accuracy of the movie I cannot attest to, it is one of
the many periods I have a blank space on. I know a little but not in any
way to call foul on. However I do not believe that matters so much,
history is history and a movie needs to tell its story, for as much
historical accuracy as we can get seek out of book or documentary. I
have no issue with a movie taking the overall tale that really happened
and tweaking it for narrative purposes, only when they insult the spirit
of the real people or make something so different that they might as
well have just made something original, to begin with. There is a scene
near the end which I know is completely fictitious but it’s fine because
it serves as a correct narrative climax. 

In the end,
things are said and we end on the black card with white text that reads
to us what happened afterward. These characters and this world never
really seems to come alive, striking cinematography and intricate
costumes and hair, but it’s all show. The elements for a good movie are
here, it just needs a breath of life within it.

Review Vice by Jonathan Evans

From the opening few minutes, we get a sense of what to expect from the rest of Vice. It opens with news footage of 9/11, the towers have been hit and are going down, then we have people in suits and in offices being guided around. In a safe space with no windows people are on phones and talking to each other trying to get a handle on the situation. One man, who is not the President, picks up the phone and tells the army that they are allowed to shoot down any planes they deem a threat. Then it cuts to black and the text appears, it reads out that this is a movie based on a real person, but also Dick Chaney is one of the most secretive modern politicians ever so there will be times when they embellish then it reads “But we did our fucking best!” So now we know that we are watching a movie based on a real-life man but because of the limited information they decided to absolutely go with their own thing and they apologise for nothing. 

When we first
meet Dick Chaney (after the opening scene previously mentioned) he is
driving home on a dirt country road with the sun beginning to rise, or maybe
set? A cop pulls him over and he is clearly very intoxicated and lights
up a cigarette. We then get helpful and playful narration in the form
of Jesse Plemons as Kurt the narrator.  Chaney started off as a no good
slacker that worked a blue-collar job, anything he could find, he got
into a good school but was kicked out because he was more interested in
drinking beer than attending class. But his girlfriend Lynne (Amy Adams)
that believes in him and want him to be a man of worth, he says that
he’ll never let her down again.

So years later he
goes back to school, get his diploma and is in Washington, when they
have their induction ceremony a man named Donald Rumsfeld (Steve Carell)
gives a speech about making sure you serve yourself, always align with
whoever the winner is and there’s no one taller than the last man
standing (well essentially this is what he says). Chaney asks what party
he is with and when he learns he’s with the Republican party he says
that his party. So under Rumsfeld’s tutilage Chaney rises through the
ranks and halts any decisions that most Liberals would vote for. Never
the less he gains power and works some of his family and friends into
his circle and every once in a while he gets a heart attack and reacts
to it like he has a bad knee that’s playing up again.

He
asks Trumble “What do we believe?” which is met with a hearty and long
laugh. What a concept, a politician who is there to serve the interest
of the people believing in something, ha! but over the course of the
movie it becomes a big recurring theme, there are many other figures
that they meet and in order to move forward with their career they will
have to put aside whatever their loved ones feel or what would hurt the
majority or even long times friends so they can get the next step. It
seems that, at least in this world of the movie or certainly these
characters we follow, none of these high profile, very powerful politicians believe in anything.  

Bale is known as an actor that truly dives deep into his characters to bring them to the screen, many times throughout his career he has drastically dropped or gained weight for a role. Sometimes to his doctor’s great worry. For this role, he almost definitely put on quite a bit of weight but also has great make-up team manipulating him to resemble the actual politician. He also adds the nice touches of having his characteristic left eye squint, raise of the right side of his mouth and shake of the head. He also has a great handle on the man’s voice, being able to manipulate it for whatever he needs for a scene, whether it be intimidating, slightly tender, menacing or relaxed. It is truly realised but also stylised performance.

Writer-director Adam McKay is not the person you would expect to handle this kind of material. He made his career on goof-ball comedies, probably most notably Anchorman. But he broke that chain with The Big Short and now seems to have a talent for penning dramatic material. Though to be sure there are laughs to be had to hear too. It is probably his experience with comedy that makes this movie so unique, A writer or director that specializes in this material would go for a flatter colour pallet, documentary feels and more reality-based dialog. McKay allows himself to be stylized and have a little more fun, taking the real people and styilizing them into charactures.

Vice tells a serious story in a funny way that is probably more memorable than any other more accurate obsessed bio that we could name about politicians. It seriously casts comedic actors for serious roles and serious actors to deliver absurd lines. It wants to do so much that you can eventually catch on that your being played with and we should probably double check all the “facts” presented in this movie. But it has such undeniable panache and enthusiasm you can’t help but be charmed. 

Review Dumbo (2019) by Jonathan Evans

“DUMBO, a major, major work. Yeah the perfect film, each sequence is totally self contained, totally complete and still pushes the picture forward.”

Sidney Lument, in conversation.

 out of 5 stars (3 / 5)

After rewatching the original DUMBO fairly recently I can attest to this statement. It is one of the most accessible and clear storytelling examples in cinema, every shot and emotion they intend to convey both from the characters and the scene rings perfectly clear.

So the question is “Why remake it?” The answer is, no real reason. really I guess I should end the review here but I should fully explain everything. A remake should take the ideas and feeling of the original but still make it it’s own thing or at least introduce some new elements and update it appropriately. But when you have something so timeless and so close to perfect your only real place to go is down.

So our story opens in 1919,
and two children, Milly (Nico Parker) and Joe (Finley Hobbins) they run
through a circus which is their home and run by Max Medici (Danny
DeVito) the ringleader and to the train station to their father Holt
(Colin Farrell) who’s back from the war, it cost him his left arm but
he’s happy to be home with his children, unfortunately his wife died
while he was away. You shouldn’t really care, the movie and the
characters don’t so let’s move on.

Medici has made an
investment, he bought a big elephant by the name of JUMBO, who is
expecting to give birth any day soon. One night she goes give birth and
the little baby emerges from hiding within a stack of hey. However, it
is not what they were expecting, because this baby has unusually large
ears. They do their best to cover them up but during one performance the
people see his ears and due to a rather clever accident with the sign
he gets named DUMBO. However, the children then learn that, with the
encouragement of a feather, his big ears can be used as wings, they have
a flying elephant, that’ll attract paying customers.

Being that DUMBO is an elephant and this is not a talking animal movie he is entirely silent throughout the movie, conveying his thoughts and emotions through his big blue eyes (this is how it should be). But being that they can’t let too much time go by without dialogue so we have two children explaining things to the audience and guiding him on his journey. This isn’t really necessary and these children just aren’t very good actors, they are either overacting or just being stonefaced throughout as well as their poor dialogue that flat-out, directly tells the audience everything.

Being that Tim Burton is
behind the camera I would expect one thing before anything else, a
strong visual flair. He brings that here, he has made a career out of
skeletons, clowns and theme parks. He sinks his visual teeth into these
images creating elaborate, slightly frightening and elaborate images
that make them seem like something more out of a fairytale than real
life.

One of the movies greatest strengths is also one of it’s greatest weaknesses and that is Michael Keaton as the villain V.A. Vandeverer.
Keaton made his name by working with Burton first in Beetlejuice then
in his two Batman movies. His career has made a resurgence recently with
Birdman and Spider-Man: Homecoming,
where he flexes his theatrical and sinister muscles like a man that
sells joyous wonder to the people while himself is only driven by greed
and narcissism. This character is a clique and is given lines that would
fit a forgettable villain during the nineties but even then he is able
to take them and make them wonderful zingers. However, no matter how
much Keaton elevates it, the question remains, why does DUMBO need a
villain? It’s DUMBO, one of the simplest stories ever told and was
devoid of a villain because it was not necessary, it was composed of the
problem of separation, not all this greed and contract complexities.
Plus some of his character’s decisions simply don’t make sense, in one
point in the movie everyone (including him) is given a chance to get
everything they want and he turns it down simply to be the villain. This
doesn’t make any sense, making a decision against the characters needs
is one thing but this would serve him too so whys would he do this? No
real reason, besides poor writing.

This wouldn’t really
be DUMBO without the inclusion of the Pink Elephant sequence. Well, to
be sure they do make an appearance but in their own unique way that is
quite stylized and fun (I’d be disappointed if it was mundane,
especially with Tim Burton behind the camera).

This movie is distinguishable from the original which shows that there are thinking independently. So far out of these movies, I would say the laziest is Beauty & The Beast. This is not a terrible movie and children will most likely be entertained and probably everyone will think the elephant is cute. But still, I have yet to see one of the remakes where I would say they improved on…well anything. For this movie, it’s not a waste of time but a much better use of it is to see the original again.R

Review Us by Jonathan Evans

 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Horror at it’s best and most profound is when it takes deep lurking insecurity within nearly everyone and fully realizes it through its images, colors, sounds and scenarios. In 2017, Jordan Peele made one of the greatest cinematic debut with Get Out, confident in its theme, refined in its layout and masterful in execution. Now he comes with his follow-up Us, about another base fear and brings his unique and refined vision to the table. 

Our
tale opens years ago, in the eighties. A little girl named Adelaide is
on vacation with her parents, they are in Santa Cruz on the beach and
enjoying the boardwalk, she wanders around and looks at the people and
the rides, her mother goes to the bathroom and her father plays a
shooting game and doesn’t pay her much attention so she wanders off by
herself. She wanders through the boardwalk, to the beach and then into a
hall of mirrors, inside she wanders and realizes she’s lost, she goes
for the exit but it is a mirror, she wanders and wanders and then has
her back to a mirror, only it isn’t a mirror because it turns and faces
her. There is another girl, that looks just like her, but is not her. 

Cut
then to years later and, we are in the present day and Adelaide has
grown up and is married with children. Her husband Gabe (Winston Duke),
daughter Zora (Shahadi Wright Joseph) and son Jason (Evan Alex). They
are going on one of their family vacations, to the same beach from that
night long ago, whatever happened there has clearly caused her great
trauma and is none too interested in going back. They meet their
“friends” the Tylers, Kitty (Elizabeth Moss) and Josh (Tim Heidecker)
along with their twin girls. 

One night while she
recounts the night in the hall of mirrors to Gabe, Jason comes in and
says “There’s a family standing in our driveway.” They go to take a look
and sure enough, there is, holding hands and just standing. Husband
tries to go out and start a conversation then tries intimidating them
but Adeline has a gut feeling that they mean harm and indeed they do.
One forces his way through the door and the others scurry around back,
they all gather in the living room with the fireplace on and in the
light they can see the intruders, they are them.  

Yes,
they have doublegangers, that look just like them but some are slightly
different and wear red jumpsuits, have one gloved hand and all carry
their own pair of uniquely shaped scissors. What do they want? To kill
them and take their lives for their own. Not the most complex motivation
but certainly a scary one.

There is very little fat
in this script. Peele constructs his scripts meticulously and
efficiently, years working as the comedy duo Key & Peele definitely
gave him a talent for efficient and clear writing. Almost no element of
what is introduced or said goes to waste, if a character has a hobby or a
bad habit then it will come into play in some way later in the movie. 

This
movies biggest success and biggest accomplishment is Lupita Nyong’o and
her performance as Adelaide. All the actors have to portray one
character and their double which are all brilliantly competent at.
Playing a regular person but then playing that person again, but moving
and reacting in an off way, which is fantastical mime acting. But
Nyong’o is able to take all these intense and subtle emotions that her
characters to go through and unifies them into her character, as well as
that she plays a twisted, disturbing presence that will most likely be
imitated for year to come, which her disturbing way of speaking by
breathing in and wide eyes that stare and never seem to blink and her
all too efficient way of walking that screams “Not right!” It is a
performance that would be great with just one of these characters, by
playing both it is a triumph.

In a horror movie,
the characters need to be afraid and convey that. If the characters
aren’t talking something seriously then we won’t. In an action movie,
you can have the hero blast monsters and face dire circumstances with a
stern look on their face throughout, but if the characters are faced
with something unnerving and are unfazed by it then we won’t engage with
it. These people are afraid but more than that they portray many facets
of fear. However, even with that, these are not just people that are
afraid throughout the movie, there are also a few laughs to be had.

Peele reunites with conductor Michael Abels to create another deep, memorable, unnerving score. Like with the last one he uses voice to invoke a deep, almost spiritual feeling within the movie but they are also singers that sing high pitched and in unison, this adds to the theme of double and the high pitched matches the strings which are sharp and shrieking, reminding us of both a scream and stabbing. Adding to the tension he will sometimes have one note continue on for too long, like a whistling kettle, giving the feeling of high pressure. 

Throughout
this movie, I was feeling everything the filmmaker wanted me to feel
while watching it. While the family were bantering and was laughing when
there’s a tense moment I was watching attentively and was horrified and
stimulated when the moments of fright were playing out. The only weak
link is the ending which makes sense poetically, but not logically, I
usually wouldn’t hold that against the movie but this was the one time I
was thinking “Wait, that doesn’t make any sense.” 

Bad horror is a cray loud guy with a hatchet. Great horror is surgen with a scalpel, knowing exactly where to cut and doing so with precision. Jordan Peele is a surgeon that cuts deep, efficiently and leaves us bleeding long afterward.

Series Review, Enid a Lucy, S4C by Gareth Williams

 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Writer Siwan Jones blends social realism and surrealist comedy in the most delightful way in Enid a Lucy. The S4C mini-series, which came to a slightly abrupt end on Sunday night, made for an entertaining and enjoyable drama. Termed the ‘Welsh Thelma and Louise’ by some, Eiry Thomas and Mabli Jên Eustace certainly provide plenty of laughs as the two leads whose offbeat road trip takes them from Llanelli to London via the most unconventional of routes.

The drama begins on a modest housing estate in Llanelli
where we meet next door neighbours Enid (Thomas) and Lucy (Jên). Enid is a piano
teacher whose home is neat and tidy, fitted with mod cons and well lit.
Meanwhile, Lucy lives in a dark, dank and messy space. The drained colour palette
of the cinematography, as well as the use of handheld camera, gives the
impression that this is going to be a gritty, class-based drama. The
introduction of Lucy’s drunken and abusive boyfriend Denfer (Steffan Cennydd),
in contrast with the genteel and traditional images of the Mother’s Union that
Enid is involved in, only serves to underline the divide that exists between
them. Yet early indications that this is going to be a serious piece of realist
drama are confounded by the end of the first episode when Enid turns getaway
driver for Lucy in order to escape the hapless Denfer and his buffoon of an
uncle, Sid (Nicholas McGaughey). What follows is a random and raucous
cat-and-mouse chase across the country as the men seek to reclaim a holdall
containing drugs and a gun from Lucy, who is determined to use the contents in
order to make a better life for her and her baby.

Siwan Jones’ script plays like a melody that is pitched just
below hard-hitting but doesn’t quite decrescendo into absolute farce. It manages
to deal with some big issues, such as childlessness and mental health, but
these never feel forced. Neither are they allowed to consume the overall
narrative, Jones ensuring that the escapades of Enid and Lucy are filled with
much hilarity and randomness. This includes perhaps the most comical scene of
the series, where two farmers that they end up staying with accidently take some
of the drugs in the holdall. Actors Ifan Huw Dafydd and Rhodri Evan really let
loose their inner zombie to produce a very funny scene. It borders on the
ridiculous but never descends into the realms of the unbelievable. It is this
kind of accurate measurement which Jones must be applauded for in the writing
of Enid a Lucy.

My only bone of contention with this drama was the finale. It was as if a timer had suddenly gone off with five minutes to go and all the loose ends had to be tied up tout suite. It left me feeling rather out-of-kilter; that such a well-paced journey should end so abruptly. Although not quite on the same level as the conclusion to BBC1’s The Replacement (2017), it nevertheless conjured up similar feelings. It is a shame because, otherwise, Enid a Lucy is a great drama, with particularly notable performances from Eiry Thomas and Mabli Jên Eustace. Thomas, in particular, slips into her character with ease here; in contrast to her over-exaggerated performance as the detective in Keeping Faith, she is completely believable as Enid. She is a joy to watch, especially during her exchanges with Eustace: the two bounce off one another wonderfully.

It is great to see S4C, via producers Boom Cymru, giving a prime-time platform to female writers at the start of 2019. Both Fflur Dafydd (35 Awr) and now Siwan Jones have provided Welsh audiences with some quality TV drama already this year. Enid a Lucy may have only received a short run, but it was fun whilst it lasted. Its slightly left-field style follows on from some of Jones’ previous work – not least 2011’s Alys – but it still feels highly original. It would have been great to have spent longer with these characters. Despite its rather hasty end though, Enid a Lucy still manages to thoroughly entertain.

Watch the series on S4C’s Clic here.

gareth

Review Fighting with My Family by Jonathan Evans

 out of 5 stars (5 / 5)

Let’s be honest, we know wrestling is fake, or at least scripted. But people buy into it because of the drama, conflict, and flash. We get invested in the narrative and the showmanship. Much like any other dramatic performance, we become engaged through the sincerity and all the flash and color just make it more interesting.

Fighting with my Family is another family drama movie about the pursuit of a dream but with the unique twist of populating it with characters that aren’t weird, but unconventional and rather rough around the edges. We open with a little boy watching wrestling on the TV, his sister changes the channel so she can watch Charmed, for this he puts her in a headlock, Dad (Nick Frost) walks in and does not break them up but instructs the boy on how to properly put her into a headlock, then Mother (Lena Headey) enters telling her to get out of it by herself. Both mum and dad are wrestlers and are heads of a local wrestling company, very low scale and just about getting by though they aren’t above doing some dodgy things to bring in some extra cash. Tonight they need an opening act so they get the kids to fight, she doesn’t want to but after they promise she’ll like it and it’s something for the family she does. While in the ring, and they are playing their parts and she hears the crowd cheer, she does indeed embrace the act of wrestling. Cut to years later and she has truly fallen in love with wrestling and is a screaming beast while in the ring.

Her name is Saraya
Knight (Florence Pugh) and she along with her brother Zak (Jack Lowden)
perform their family act in their local community center or gym,
wherever they can, and get by with what they have but dream of the big
time. They get others involved, Zak goes out into the town and brings in
the local kids the be a part of wrestling, it focuses them, builds up
their teamwork skills and keeps them away from drugs and other shady
activities. He even gets the boy from the neighborhood who’s blind into
the ring.

One night they get a call back from the
WWE (World Wrestling Entertainment) that they have reviewed the tapes
they’ve sent of Saraya and Zak in the ring and they’ve been called in to
audition and that could lead to training in California. 

Making
two very announced appearances in the movie is Dwayne ‘The Rock’
Johnson. Small independent movies have a tough time getting made so they
probably needed some kind of big name behind to get the financing.
Being that he is also the producer why not give him a place in the
story? As has been proved with his career in the ring and in front of
the movie camera he is a force of charisma, when he is on-screen it is a
delight. Both times he appears is for a crucial element of the plot so
it is not simply inserting an iconic celebrity to simply make the
audience that’s for fans gush but of structural importance to the
narrative. 

During the audition they are assisted by
Hutch Morgan (Vince Vaughn) that is strict, to the point and easily
throws around a few cutting remarks, but if they can’t handle this one
mans remarks how will they stand to have thousands of people screaming
obscenities and booing them? In the end, Saraya and only she goes
through the next round. So she has to go to California alone, but she
perseveres because this is for her family. 

Wrestling
training doesn’t just consist of getting toned, they need to learn how
to communicate between each other, what moves the other is doing and how
to appropriately roll with the punches and get in the right position to
take a fall or catch the other. If they don’t then one could break the
other’s nose or even cripple them. Also how to start the match by
talking smack to the other wrestler to get the crowd fired up and build
tension between their two characters, also how to deal with hecklers. 

Taking
on writing and directing duties is Stephen Merchant, most famous for
being Ricky Gervais writing partner on The Office, Extras and other
movies. He goes out on his own to make a movie purely that is his.
Writing is definitely is the strongest ability, being able to structure a
plot and infuse the characters with their unique voice and have one
scene start as a comedy and then into a serious moment. He is able to
make great use of visuals with the wide space of the stadium and some
nice visual gags.

This is a comedy, mostly. There
are some very funny moments in it but it also has deep cutting drama.
You get to know these people and how they’ve come together through
wrestling, how it’s redeemed then and they’ve hung their entire hopes
and dreams on hitting the big time and to be denied it is one of the
biggest blows they can ever face.

When the big fight came for the climax of the movie (which of course was gonna be the climax of this movie) I found that I was truly engaged in it. I knew that the characters themselves were in no real risk, these were professionals, but I cared about how hard it was for them to get to this point and what victory would mean to them. I was able to understand that it was performers but able to connect with the emotional journey happening and isn’t that what movies themselves are?!