All posts by Hannah Goslin

[...]

Review, Mysteries of the Picts, Sauna Sessions, Sauna Theatre, Edinburgh Fringe by Hannah Goslin

 out of 5 stars (5 / 5)

If you had told me that there was a theatre in a sauna… I would have been confused and told you you were lying. Why would anyone think that (albeit genius) idea up? Well, in come Sauna Theatre, who have done just that and triumphed beyond anything. 

I love a sauna like anyone else, but it’s usually just a place you relax as a spa or post gym workout. Not somewhere I really thought of theatre being positioned. How would it work with the intense heat? How does a performer even get on with this environment? But my expectations were by far surpassed with actually how genius an idea this is. 

Sauna Theatre has set up at the wonderful Summerhall, with a huge circular sauna built in their courtyard. Everything is thought of – changing rooms, lockers, places to dry your hair after, spare flip flops, costumes, towels, the whole lot! Comms beforehand with all the things you need to bring as so clear but still, if you need anything or forget anything, it’s all there for you. 

There are a range of sessions you can join – some look like they pull on the traditional sauna, with relaxation sessions in the morning, but there are also raves, night time activities and, what I chose, Mysteries of the Picts – a storytelling, theatrical session where you are immersed in the sauna and the history of the Scottish lands. Anyone who knows me knows my deep love of Scotland, its history and everything in between and beyond. So to know more about the picts in such a setting was truly exciting. I couldn’t anticipate exactly how brilliant it was. 

Set in 3 sessions, there’s enough time to have a short break from the heat, quick cold plunge, drink and back into it. The acts felt like no time at all – I found out later that these were 15 mins each but they were so enjoyable and I was so involved that it felt like no time at all. It was only noticeable when the heat became ever so slightly uncomfortable, meaning the break was well needed and timed. This isn’t a criticism – this would happen at a normal sauna, but part of me never wanted to leave, another desperately needed some cool air. 

The sessions were broken up from the beginning to “the end” of the Picts, picking up on archeological finds and theories, with verbatim voice overs but mainly wonderful storytelling from two actors. They were supported by our Sauna gurus, who equally took up space, adding ice balls filled with beautiful scents of lavender, mead, thyme and then performing intricate and traditional fan and towel movements to circulate the air and smells. It was a wonderful equal measure of relaxation, awe and invested learning. It was absolutely perfect. It evoked the feeling of days gone by of swapping stories across a fireplace and potentially in sweat lodges such as this. It felt tribal, traditional and ancient. We felt part of something more earthly and worldly. 

The end really leaned into the relaxed lifestyle, when our sauna guides really became playful – water and scents dripping from immersed leaves were artfully moved around the space, around us and then, deeply submerged and playfully thrown across us. Cue laughter, an intense coolness and then increase in heat, smiles all around from participants and performers – it really was a beautiful ending to such a fantastic experience. 

Sauna Theatre, Sauna Sessions and especially, Mysteries of the Picts is a tour de force in immersive theatre. An experience like no other, I could do this over and over again, never tire, and only want more. It was total perfection.

Review, Boyking, Lil Wenker, Edinburgh Fringe, By Hannah Goslin

 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Take all the typical royal stories you hear of succession, throw in a drag king and a whole heap of humour and you have Lil Wenker’s Boyking. 

I was introduced to Lil Wenker last year with their western cowboy turned accountant act and instantly knew I needed to see more of them. This year, they bring the story of 8 year old Prince Wilfred who is 14th in line to the throne and very unhappy about it. What ensues is a catalyst to trudging up his deep and dark evil side, as he embarks on becoming King through any means. 

Boyking is rude and crude from the start. We get multiple characters out of Lil Wenker, from the court jester, to snippets of his father and the odd brother. His mother appears but only as a giant boob, manipulated and grotesque in a Bouffon style appendage that appears from off stage and breast feeds the Prince. The characters are distinctive and prompted with different voices, mannerisms, physicality and associated props which are all very clever to bring the story forward. They’re not deep characters and that works perfectly; enough to give shock but also enough that you’re not emotionally invested. 

Everything is highly elevated and exaggerated. A large crown that allows Lil Wenker to provide some hilarious physicality with audience interaction that could border on too much for anyone else but who for Lil Wenker pulls laugh after laugh from it the more it goes on. There’s also to say that we are all involved throughout; don’t think that you can go without being interacted with or asking for some involvement. And this is always welcomed – it adds to the hilarity and, when audience interaction is unexpected, Lil Wenker is skilled enough that this doesn’t throw them – they go with it and it only adds to the fun. 

There are really dark, black comedy moments however – when Boyking is evil, the grotesque boob, to name just a few and this is a level more than their last show. Without the traditional physical aspect of Bouffon, it still touches on this dark and taboo humour which makes you occasionally gasp-laugh with the shock factor but also, with great intellectual comedy.

Boyking is dark, naughty and ever so funny. Prepare to be hilariously shocked and belly laugh throughout.

Review, Francisco de Nata, Edinburgh Fringe, By Hannah Goslin

 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

It’s hard to miss a large giraffe head across the fringe. I heard of Francisco last year and sadly never got the chance to see him. But that yellow and brown pattern has haunted me ever since – haunted me for a missed opportunity. 

What transpires is one hour of complete and enjoyable nonsense. I’m not sure if there was a story per se but little small sketches throughout that seamlessly linked into one another or slightly circled back.. The majority of the narrative is to enable a healthy dose of audience interaction and it works very effectively. So, easy to say, if you’re the shy and retiring type, this is not for you – but nothing to fear, Francisco is nothing but friendly, even if his visible bum cheeks feel slightly daunting at first. 

Francisco has made a very impressive headdress, something from Lion King comes to mind. Made out of cardboard and not entirely accurate or anatomically correct, the small hole for his face allows him to make confident and hilarious eye contact, sound and facial expressions. This all adds to the ridiculous humour and there’s no rhyme or reason to why the giraffe’s interactions are sometimes from his face or the giraffe’s inches above him. We don’t question it as it only adds to the humour and ridiculous nature. 

I’ve alluded to it but moving down, we are often treated with a full view of his bottom. There’s nothing sexual or necessarily crude in this, but only elevates the nonsense more and adds to the overall costume – with slightly mismatched patterned accessories, verging on leopard rather than giraffe. It might seem like something that a starting out act might do in absence of funds but this is actually a very clever approach and weirdly goes together. 

There’s a little bit of Mr Bean about this act. Very little actual speech is uttered, and if it is, it’s almost mime. But we entirely get what he means. Slight, more obvious prompts are made to help the audience along but he fully embodies his act through physicality which is innately funny. His interactions with the audience are abundant but nothing terrifying. There’s some slight crude-ish humour – think sniffing his ever growing quantity of g-strings on a washing line, but mostly it has a tinge of slapstick and a touch of flirtation. 

Francisco de Nata is just pure nonsense of the best kind. It’s one hour of surprising comedy, evoking the naughtier side of Rowan Atkinson and providing humour that trails one after the other in perfect succession.

Review, Archduke, The Royal Court Theatre, by Hannah Goslin

 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Walking into the main space of The Royal Court, you are confronted with a huge tunnel. highlighted by a lighted ring. This imposing stage is phenomenal, careering off and around the back to an area you can’t see. This initial image is something special and sets you up for something so unique.

Archduke is a black comedy theatrical production, based on the pre-events to World War I, where three men are recruited to commit the murder of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. All are coming to the end of their lives and are coaxed by a slightly power hungry and sexist captain, and supplied final meals by a quirky but slightly mad older Serbian woman.

One of the main things that stood out the most to be is the absolutely astonishing staging. Yes, you may go to large west end theatres and see something like this. With the higher funding and large scale stage capacity. But there’s something about this intricate and beautiful staging within this space which is awe-inspiring. As mentioned at the beginning, the whole stage is a tunnel that curves to the back of the stage and this is often the entrance for the characters. It’s upgraded with furniture throughout to create other chambers, acting as rooms. But an audible gasp is triggered when a full train carriage looms out of the darkness, as if it is about to fall into the audience. The detail is beautiful and execution is seamless. Even without the narrative, I could have given these stars for the staging alone.

The narrative and writing is also brilliant. The three young men are strangers but are joined together in this quest to complete this final act. But what comes across and within this relationship is almost a Inbetweeners-like group of men. They are a little inexperienced with life, not the brightest, young and interested in things only young men are – sandwiches and women. They bounce off one another, fight, laugh all like you would see in a coming of age comedy. It’s almost like a modern comedy show on Channel 4 has been sucked back in time.

But amongst the comedy, there are moments. Moments where they realise the complexities and impact of this quest and the end of their lives. It is so well planned, between the comedy, enough to evoke emotion and not take away from the humour or the humour take away from the serious points.

Our Serbian woman, is quintessential – dressed in traditional serbian clothing, but with a mothering instinct, she drives home comedy regularly with her attempts to distract and not send the men to their deaths, with pudding and sacks of snacks. It’s interesting to see that we later get a diatribe about women being witches and weilding power, and the only female we see has little power and conducts traditional “female” duties – cooking, cleaning etc. She’s both a pocket of sunshine as well as a stark reminder on sexism.

Finally, we have to mention the Captain, played by Marc Wootton. We probably know him the most as Mr Poppy in the Nativity film series. A bumbling, bubble of joy and positivity I’ll admit, I haven’t seen him in much else but even comparing the two characters, he is fantastic. He commands the stage and is completely a different character to what we know. You easily forget him as anything else and he is entirely the Captain. He is also darkly humorous and, amongst this band of misfits, fits as yet another character who is lacking in life but in such a humorous way.

Archduke is a stellar production, with beautiful staging and fantastic writing; a darkly humorous production performed by a brilliant cast.

ARCHDUKE by Rajiv Joseph;
Production;
Cast: Janice Connolly, Stanley Morgan, Abraham Popoola, Chris Walley, Marc Wootton;
Directed by Lyndsey Turner;
Designer: Es Devlin;
Lighting Designer: Neil Austin;
Sound Designer: Tingying Dong;
Costume Designer: Evie Gurney;
Illusion Designer: Skylar Fox;
Casting Director: Julia Horan CDG;
Fight Director: Sam Lyon-Behan;
Royal Court Theatre in association with Brian & Dayna Lee;
London, UK;
19 June 2026;
Photo: Helen Murray
www.helenmurrayphotos.com

Review, John Proctor is the Villain, Royal Court Theatre, By Hannah Goslin

 out of 5 stars (5 / 5)

Please note there may be a slight spoiler in this review.

Harking back to many a youth, we are catapulted into an American school room to be amongst the teens, as they start to face questions around love, sex, misogyny and pop stars. They also have to face school, with all its complexities and a latest assignment, based on The Crucible.

John Proctor is the Villain is a story about a group of young, high school girls, around the time of the Me Too movement, with its impact on them, the local community as well as the trials of growing up, boys, pop culture, feminism, growing bodies and minds and confusing feelings. We see it from their conversations in their literature class with their young male teacher, their after-school feminist club and the moments in between, before and after school where an empty classroom is meant to be a place of sanctuary but doesn’t hold itself as that safe space. As they delve into sex education and The Crucible, their lives unravel, almost mirroring the story-line of the play with woman being the blame, men supported for wrongdoings and gossip running riot, resulting in them really reaching their feminist height, pulling the boys along with them and fighting back.

Remembering my own days of reading and performing The Crucible at school, this already evoked memories of discussing the play and its impression upon me as a young wannabe-actor. However, even these nearly 20 years later, I found myself newly informed and immersed in the discussions, factoring that John Proctor was pictured a hero and the women still as the villains. A story about the dangerous spread of gossip and rumour, we still side with his stoicism and rarely comment on the play being written by a male and the male view on the female characters. I found myself already with a renewed outlook, feeling like I was one of the girls discussing this and all the interpretations. Oh my horror when I remember how I was cast as Proctor way back when…

There’s a real sense of relatability as a female – while set in America, teenage girls are teenage girls, and all the performers (Lauren Ajufo, Holly Howden Gilchrist, Clare Hughes, Miya James and Sadie Soverall) evoke that youthful-ness, excited-ness and awkwardness that we all felt at that age. In a specific time where our minds and bodies are growing, our brains being somewhat working towards adulthood but still children, they brought this to life without it feeling satirical or unnatural. Each with their own personalities, there was no stereotyping here but something still very relatable. The excitement over a boy liking you, the girlish crush on your young teacher, the blow ups of friendships and family… all so normal yet still so dramatic. We want to be part of them, and we gasp and laugh as they do. We want to dance when they dance and we cheer them on when they fight back. Their relationships are so easy and natural and funny – so teenage and so girl-like. I can remember those moments with my own friends back at school.

When things get hard, we feel it. And we remember it from our own time. While the shocking turn of events may not have happened to us in our lives, we maybe heard stories of it in other places with other people, and went through our own serious moments while trying to grow up and be children at the same time. It’s still shocking and the theatrical techniques used to drop these bombshells is impactful. It only heightens the great acting on stage. The lighting, scene changes, spotlights highlighting character’s feelings at the time, all add to enhance this production from the script to the stage.

One can’t go without a mention of Dónal Finn. Like many, I am on the Finn train after his recent appearances in The Other Bennet Sister and Young Sherlock. Already two very different characters in themselves, Finn throws in yet another drastic change of character as Mr Smith. A likeable, excitable character, we can’t help but have a girlish crush ourselves and lean to liking him. So when things are turned upside down, the change from our impression of him is still as shocking. His character doesn’t change necessarily but it is felt under the surface; something running as a current. And his uncomfortable-ness at the crescendo is plastered naturally across his face and enveloped in his tense body language, ready to burst. If you happen to see all 3 of these credits in quick succession, you will see what a real upcoming talented star this man is becoming. One to look out for.

John Proctor is the Villain is a triumph of a production, relatable yet sufficiently dramatic. It questions everything we were ever taught about a fantastic play and forces us to continue to question feminism and the long way we still have to go.

Review: Iron Fantasy, She Goat, Soho Theatre, By Hannah Goslin

 out of 5 stars (3 / 5)

What does it mean to feel strong? A question, not often thought about but an important one none the less. Have we ever thought what it means to feel strong before? She Goat therefore ask this question and investigate it further, turning the results into a musical and comedic filled theatre show.

Iron Fantasy is the journey of these two performers to find what it means to feel strong, as a human, as a woman, from the influences of Xena Warrior Princess, Medieval storytelling and culture, and the world of fitness. However, while they body build, drink raw eggs and get new Knight costumes, their journey develops more into questioning them as females, their past and their future – what does it mean to be strong really, in both themselves and as women?

The duo start this quest by peeling themselves out from behind the curtain, with wrist and knee braces, reciting random phrases, some hilarious and some with little sense to them. We find out that these quotes are from children and the youth as they researched for their show. “As strong as eating a bear” or “pulling a car with your teeth” are funny and almost joyous thoughts on what being strong means. They investigate how this changes over age, when life becomes different and the quotes change, from not only the children but themselves as they get older.

Comedic takes on re-enaction of their body building sessions, their love of Xena, are fun to watch and they have a great dynamic between them, bouncing off one another, showing a true friendship and creative partnership. We fall into this comfortable pattern with them, relaxing in our seats and letting the musical interludes and funny scenes wash over us. That is until it gets all too real.

The duo each choose a real life scenario, that does build up, with sneaky interruptions up to this point, until they break through the facade. These aren’t a whack in the face, or massively shocking but they are impactful. A gentle approach is taken to delivering this but it felt a little lost from the high energy up to this point. The important points and stories soon feel a little of an after thought and that feels a real shame.

Overall, Iron Fantasy is a fun and unique debut for She Goat. It is fun, the duo are likeable and have a great concept. I just wanted the final end note to hit more of a punch and not get lost when it was so important.

Review, Guess How Much I Love You?, Royal Court Theatre, By Hannah Goslin

 out of 5 stars (5 / 5)

Forewarning: this review may allude to spoilers and trigger warnings related to pregnancy.

Sometimes, theatre needs to pull back the pomp and circumstance and deliver work that is raw and unfiltered. And this is exactly what the Royal Court Theatre have done with Guess How Much I Love You?

This production shows the relationship between a young married couple, from their 20 week scan and through the unexpected turmoil from the results of this. We watch as their hearts and relationship break and rebuild, through unimaginable circumstances and laid completely bare to us and our own emotions.

Robert Aramayo, who has just won himself two Baftas, and Rosie Sheehy present an intimate and realistic couple, so much so that it almost feels as if we are peaking in through that fourth wall to something private. They bounce off one another in a natural way and present something ever so real.

The writing itself lends itself, along with their fantastic acting, to build us up, wrap us in their love, which packs the punch so much more when the blows come. It makes us feel their pain as raw and heartbreakingly as they may feel and it does not stop when we think it will… it’s almost like Luke Norris when writing the play thought “are those all the tears you have? I want more!” Norris has not shied away from the real conversations, the moments of anger and hatred as well as deep love, unconditional and the juxtaposition between these moments is again, so raw and truthful. No pretending this is some fairy story or happily ever after… which, there is somewhat of one, but, a very difficult happily ever after.

The set is simple – glimpses into hospital wards, their bedroom, their bathroom, and propped up high above us. We look in but the rooms are small and again, we feel like we are peaking into the privacy of their lives. It makes when we meet their baby all the more close and makes them seem even smaller, unconsciously, and we want to reach out and cuddle him ourselves. Scene changes are abrupt, filling the room in pitch black and ominous instrumentals that are neither jolly nor frighting, but creates an uneasiness; and this is so effective to give us the tiniest of reprieves. We’re then treated with this open, full stage, in the end scene, with the two at the beach, almost like the pressure of their feelings and situation has relented. The writing brings the story back around full circle, but not after we’re beaten and bruised by the former emotional roller coaster.

Guess How Much I Love You? is every bit beautiful, painful and hard hitting. Not a dry eye in the house, you’ll come away in awe of this production and needing a few minutes to collect yourself – all in the best way that fantastic theatre creates.

Review, The Sh*theads, Royal Court Theatre, By Hannah Goslin

 out of 5 stars (3 / 5)

In this Utopian meets historical retelling of our past, The Sh*theads at the Royal Court Theatre does not hold back its mercy on bringing the intensity of love, violence and a willingness to live to the audience.

Looking back on early man, the debut from Jack Nicholls looks at how we began, grew, the nature of survival and the core feelings and emotions of human beings. At a state where the world is changing, we assume, for an ice age, a family fight for their survival, fearing the dangers of the world through story telling and belief without any other influence. When someone outside of their family unit joins, it pushes them to the reveal the lies about their way of life and soon the love becomes hatred and violence.

Our stage is kitted out, just like we would expect from early man – a cave with red painting on the wall of it, depicting hunting of animals by humans, with a small staircase of rock and hole at the top shining in light. The set changes little but when we move from the outside, in, to show the development of the family to the “others” (or, Sh*theads as they are known), this becomes a little more sophisticated; a standing lamp, chandelier made from bones, carpets put out – along with the animal print clothing that borders on modern, there’s a unique modernist yet dystopian feeling to this view of the past.

All the characters are larger than life and, while not a “stereotype”, they do lean into a certain differing character; the father is a eccentric man, ageing and a life long injury, the youngest daughter is bubbly and bouncy, with no filter, like most toddlers and Clare, the oldest daughter, while bordering psychotic, is strangely often the leader and voice of reason. The Sh*theads are also well rounded and different characters – a slightly simpler man, almost excitable as a child and his partner who is inquisitive and in her own right pretty fierce. The different dynamics work well, particularly when all descends into chaos.

My favourite part of this production has to be the puppetry. This is in the guise of the Sh*thead’s baby – evoking similarities to a smaller version of Little Amal, with effective and lifelike movement and voice and later a young doe eating grass. However, our first impression of the whole production is a huge, life-like Elk. Similar to War Horse, puppeteers envelope themselves within the structure and you forget that this is not a real animal. It is beautiful and yet made with a raggety-ness to it that feels homemade yet highly professional. It makes the circumstances it falls into all the more emotional.

The Sh*theads is a great production. It is beautiful aesthetically, with well thought out characters and an interesting story-line. However, while I cannot quite pick out what it was, it felt a little like the shining element to make it an outstanding piece of theatre was missing. Enjoyable none the less and worth watching despite it missing that little piece of the puzzle.

Review, BIGRE / “Fish Bowl”, Compagnie le Fils du Grand Réseau, By Hannah Goslin

 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

As part of MimeLondon, Companie le Fils du Grand Réseau bring us this hilarious “silent” comedy, Fish Bowl. While part of MimeLondon and, as highlighted by quotation marks over the silent, it is not wholly a silent mime example, it is a whole lot of fun and chaos.

Fish Bowl is about three apartments in the same building, each containing a very different resident. Their tiny living quarters are sliced in half to allow us to see within, for their daily lives spread across all seasons and events. While on a large stage that is the Peacock Theatre, this one set has the sense of its small areas enhanced by the performer’s over-exaggerated movements and clever positioning of the staging interiors. For example, the tiny hallway, in reality, opens across the whole stage, but the performers contort themselves around the boxes and keeping to this small slither to really show how tiny this little world is.

Each character is starkly different, and there is something cartoon-like in the stereotyped universes they inhabit. We have a suited moped man whose flat is all white and clean, helped by his habit of hoovering his shoes as he enters; the hippy type who is full to the brim of items from boxes to furniture, leading to his sleeping area to consist of a hammock which evokes laughter when we first see it; and lastly, a pretty female whose flat is all pink and girly yet full of comfort. Despite these differences, we see the group warm to one another, the men lusting after the woman, friendships begin and fade and rekindle, and these character’s stories go in directions you never would have thought.

The humour is brilliantly done – a lot is reliant on physicality and involves clambering the staging or clever prop trickery, with some of the hilarity coming from age old comedy such as toilet humour or a peak at someone in their pants. Others are a bit darker but no less hilarious and shocks us in the transition.

When I highlighted silent in air quotes, this was to mean that the production isn’t wholly silent. However, this doesn’t diminish from the great physicality and some which is shocking and surprising. Music accompanies parts, there are sound effects and the only vocal sources from the characters are almost “Mr Bean”-like, with exclamatory noises or one words chorused. We understand everything that happens and these sound bites only add to the great action on stage.

Fish Bowl is a highly engaging feat of physical comedy, pulling from ordinary and relatable characters and lives but heightening the action to create a hilarious and fun production.

Review, Garry Starr: Classic Penguins, Francesca Moody Productions in association with MILKE and Underbelly, Ed Fringe, By Hannah Goslin

 out of 5 stars (5 / 5)

As a book lover, and, despite this, very much being influenced by the “book’s cover” Garry Starr was plastered around all things ed fringe and I knew, I would just need to see what this about. What I actually saw, was way beyond anything I ever expected.

Garry Starr: Classic Penguins is a show that attempts to go through every single penguin book within the time allowed, creating hilarious comedy through quick and basic acting out of the titles, audience engagement and … oh… a whole heap of nakedness. That’s right. As we enter, there’s a aesthetic of a villain’s ice lair, with Starr in a high backed chair and clearly a top hat and tails. But when he swivels around, we see Starr at his full nudeness. The show proceeds in this fashion, with much lewd comedy sought from this, some…ahem… intimate puppetry and zero boundaries in physicality. At some point, you get used to this and suddenly Starr will pull out something out of his hat (metaphorically) that takes us back to the rude comedy basics. I will say, that the nakedness doesn’t really add anything to the performance – there’s no real rhyme or reason, but you can’t be mad because it’s totally absurd and ridiculous and entire chaos. It’s such a mad production, that you actually do not stop laughing, whether specifically prompted or just because you cannot believe what is happening.

The actual “recreation” of the books are very clever. Very to the point and as described, there are bits that are heightened to either gross us out or make us shocked, and others that actually are physically impressive. To ourselves, we start to guess what’s next. Most of the time, the acting begins before we are told the true title and, any book lover, begins to try to get ahead of Starr and what he is recreating.

Starr himself is having a whale of a time – with no qualms of his state of dress or interactions with us, he is laughing and enjoying every moment as much as us. As with any audience interaction, there are curve balls and he relishes this and uses it very much to his advantage to pull more and more laughs from us. In pockets of the production, we actually feel as if we are just Starr’s friends, being as silly and ridiculous as he is, despite being within a large, sold out venue.

Garry Starr: Classic Penguins is an absolutely nuts and nonsensical production, with ranging high to low levels of comedy and concept. It is mania of the best kind and one of the most bizarre but brilliant productions at fringe.