Category Archives: Film & TV

Review Shazam! by Jonathan Evans

 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

What world am I living in? If you wound the clock back to 2012 and say that there’s a new DC cinematic universe coming and Batman and Superman will be the disasters but Wonder Woman, Aquaman, and now Shazam! will be the winners of the bunch, I’d have looked at you like you were bonkers. Yet here we are, a movie about a beloved character from the comics that I’d thought would never get his own movie and if he did it would be forced through that dark or complex filter that DC movies seem to put most of their characters through. I am so happy this is not the case and we’ve got what we got.

Side note, this character was referred to as “Captain Marvel” for a long time, but due to legal reasons, it has been changed to Shazam which adds a whole lot of complications to it. I guess obviously if this movie was out and Captain Marvel that would lead to a very confused audience, both in the movie theaters and in the comic stores.

The setting is not of the dark gritty crime-ridden streets of Batman, the high tech science fiction of Superman, the mythological scale of Wonder Woman but a realm of magic, as in true fantasy magic, wizards, words, robes, and staffs. This gives the character and now the movie it’s own unique tone and personality to distinguish itself amongst its competition.

Our tale begins on a dark snowy night where a little boy is in the back of a car and his father is driving and elder brother is in the front.  The elder brother and father clearly get along and care very little for him. But suddenly the little boy is transported to a deep cave with statues and an old man with a long beard, covered in long robes and holding a staff. This old man is a wizard (Djimon Housou) that offers this little boy great power, but the statues (that represent the seven deadly sins) tempt the boy to take an evil eye, this was a test and he has failed so he is cast out. Back to his old, loveless relatives.

We are then taken to years later and a little boy is at a carnival with his mother, trying to win him a toy tiger. She can’t win the tiger but does get him a compass. While walking through the crowd the two get separated, the boy is taken in by the police and his mother never comes for him, he is alone. Skipping again to years later, now present day and the boy has grown up a few years into an early teenager and his name is Bill Batson (Ashner Angel), he’s been in and out of foster homes for years always looking for his mother. Now he is in Philadelphia and put into another home. This one of the Vazquez, who have adopted many foster children. One of which is Freddy (Zack Dylan Grazer) who requires a crutch to walk but certainly never lets that get his spirits down. 

Now in the present, the little boy in the car has grown up to become Dr. Thaddeus Sivana (Mark Strong). he has been searching for years for a way to get back into that mysterious realm of the wizard, fortunately for him he has now found it and takes the dark power for himself, unleashing the seven deadly sins from captivity and upon the world. So now we have our villain!

So, in his desperation, Billy Batson is taken to the cave and offered the power f the wizard known as Shazam! The powers are mean to be bestowed on a person with a pure heart but Billy is simply a good enough person. So when he speaks the wizards name a bolt of lightning hits him and he is transformed into a full grown man in his very own super suit, light up logo, cape and everything.

It is the casting of Zachary Levi as Shazam that is the cornerstone for the movie’s success. He is so unashamedly a big kid, from his energy to his broad expressions you believe that there is a child working this adult body. 

This movie takes place in the winter and within the gray streets of a city, but it is the characters clothing that makes them pop. Each character has their main color, Billy is red, Freddy is blue, another is purple, another is green and the villain wears black. This is a color move and a stylized superhero one so naturally, people are color-coordinated.

So now that he has been granted the body of an adult and has superpowers what to do now? Test them out! In a montage set to Queens Don’t Stop Me Now where Billy along with Freddy test out his new body and see what its capable of. This sequence is for the audience to learn what powers Shazam has too as well as a simple serving of fun. These are children that have been handed these amazing abilities, of course, this is how they’d go about it.

This movie knows what it wants to be. It knows that it wants to tell a superhero story from the perspective of a child that isn’t taking this all too seriously so neither are the filmmakers. It knows to insert it’s tongue firmly in its cheek. However, this is probably the movie the be the most emotionally heavy, some filmmakers believe that dark equals emotional, it does not, something does not have to be dark it just needs to mean something of great importance to the characters and for you to be able to connect to it. If it’s all dark then it’s just unpleasant, but with the right amount of balancing between colorful and heavy emotional moments, then you have a truly whole experience.

As a fan of Superman and Batman, I am saddened by them getting poor treatment movies, but they have already had their good treatments and left their cinematic mark. It is time for new characters to get their time in the sun and for people to learn about their unique mythos and characters. I wholeheartedly embrace the renaissance of the underdog superheroes getting the treatment they deserve. This movie is fun, dark, emotional and well crafted, like an Ablin movie at their peak.
R

Review Pet Sematary by Jonathan Evans

 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Grief is a powerful emotion. It can cause the most crippling loneliness and make us seek out all possible alternatives to fill the gap that is left when a loved one is gone. But what would it take to bring something back and if they do come back, will they ever be the same? This is the main theme running through Pet Sematary, one of Stephen Kings most acclaimed and celebrated works.

Like
nearly all horror movies this opens with a family, in a car, moving to a
new home. There is the father Louis (Jason Clarke), his wife Rachel
(Amy Seimetz), daughter Ellie (Jete Laurence), son Gage (Hugo and Lucas
Lavourie) and cat Church, these are the Creeds. They are moving away
from the city to Maine where life is less busy and simpler. They arrive
at their new home and take it in along with the forest behind it, that
is cut short when a speeding truck rushes pasts them.

One day while walking through the forest they hear a bang of some kind, then they see children walking inline, one has a little drum, they all have masks of animals on and one is pushing a wheelbarrow with a dead dog in it. They follow the children and see that a few trees have a spiral carved into them and they come to a place called “Pet Sematary” where the local children bury their departed pets. This is when we also meet Jud (John Lithgow). An old man that lives in the house next to them, he’s lived around here all his life and knows about some of the ancient traditions and lore of the land. He quickly becomes a friend to the family.

One day Jud needs to have a private word
with Louis, Church has been killed in a road accident. They decided to
keep it from Ellie deciding to tell her that he ran away. They go to
bury him amongst the other pets but Jud says he knows a better place to
bury him. So they climb a wall of trees behind the cemetery, walks
through a swamp and climb up to a hilltop where he tells Louis to bury
Church and mark it with stones. The next day Louis and Rachel tell Ellie
about Church but she says he hasn’t run away, he came back yesterday,
he’s in her closet right now, which indeed he is.

We
learn that, for whatever reason, when you bury something in that hilltop
they come back. There are ancient folklores about a creature called the
Windego and other stories and theories but it doesn’t matter, the cat
has returned, but not the same, more violent. And so begins the whole
macabre affair and the ultimate sentence of the movie “Sometimes dead,
is better.”

This is a world of old, dark trees, where
mist rolls in and things can emerge and disappear within it, where much
is primitive so crosses and signs are held together with knots. it
invokes an ancient, ritualistic atmosphere to the whole movie. But keeps
it’s shaping simple so they are easily recognizable and can become
symbols for the movie.

King wouldn’t be so celebrated
if his work didn’t have some kind of merit. He has produced his share of
goofy or even not very good products but he is still undeniably a man
of talent. He works best when he creates characters with deep emotional
problems and a situation that highlights human insecurities and layers
it with something supernatural. This is such a material.

As an adaptation, I cannot speak for because at the time of writing this I have yet to read the book. However, I don’t believe this is a detriment to my ability to review the movie. A product should be able to stand on its own, a novelisation of a play should be perfectly enjoyable as it is and not have to depend on its source material. This is a complete story as it is, there may be more details in the book and it may, in fact, be the more well crafted and better version of this tale or maybe the movie improves upon it, I don’t know but either way, it doesn’t matter.

Ironically I recently reviewed Us and wrote
about how horror at its best is not like a hatchet but like a scalpel.
Well, I would say that there are moments of shock within this movie and
they did indeed make me jump with fright. This isn’t the worst thing but
it won’t age the movie well, shocks work once and maybe two more times
after initial watching but after that, you know what’s coming and can
prepare yourself for them. What lingers with you in horror movie, or
really just movies in general, is the buildup and the unseen and the
feeling of dread and anticipation before anything happens. This has
those and they rely upon what the characters have said, the sound and
the unseen before something comes out of the dark and goes bang.

This is a horror movie with a chilling concept at its center, some creepy visuals and terrifying moments, other times when it just goes all out and yells at you with something gross on-screen. King fans will either like it or nitpick the way the material was handled. But from the acting to the production, to the sound and even the ideas that fester within you afterward, I say this is a solid piece of work.

Review Mary Queen of Scots by Jonathan Evans

 out of 5 stars (2 / 5)

Two sisters, one is already the Queen of England, the other, younger to be the Queen of Scotland. They could have both ruled peacefully throughout but pride and the manipulation and other greedy men forced conflict and led to the death of one. Mary Queen of Scots tells the story of Queen Mary (Saoirse Ronan), her arrival in Scotland and most of the events that lead to her execution, that wasn’t a spoiler, by the way, its the scene that opens the movie.

Mary’s boat
pulls in on the isle of Scotland and her and her followers set up in a
castle. Greeting her is the Erl of Moray (James McArdle) her half
brother, also there is John Knox (David Tennant) the protestant cleric,
he is against Mary taking up the throne because she is Catholic and
after he makes this very clear and shows her little to no respect she
dismisses him from her court. 

As portraits and
historical accounts tell us Mary was a great beauty and Elizabeth had
harsher features. This is how they play it in the movie but we can
clearly see that Margot Robbie is a very attractive woman in her own
right. Even after she suffers an illness
and has to be caked in heavy gaudy makeup we can still see through that
and know she is beautiful. This is a case of the movie saying one thing
while we can clearly see that this isn’t the case. To Robbie’s credit,
this is a role where she challenges herself and does something
different.  Throughout her career, she has not been content with simply
relying on being one thing. She made her name as a sex bomb in The Wolf of Wall Street, became the bouncing mad Harley Quinn in Suicide Squad, a manic colorful killer in Terminal and a very rough around the edges figure skater in I, Tonya.
She is usually the best thing in whatever movie she’s in even if the
movie is less than stellar. Her she plays the iconic queen that was by
all accounts fastidious and kept composure at all costs, along with her
flawless English accent this is another notch on her impressive and
diverse filmography.

All the actors are very good here.
These are accomplished actors that have to go through multiple moods
within the movie, except for Tennant who is a grumpy bearded man
throughout. They adjust themselves depending on who they are talking to.
Whether they are talking to an equal, someone below them, someone
they’re attracted to or someone who’s trust they are trying to gain and
after they’ve gained it speak to them differently.

For
the historical accuracy of the movie I cannot attest to, it is one of
the many periods I have a blank space on. I know a little but not in any
way to call foul on. However I do not believe that matters so much,
history is history and a movie needs to tell its story, for as much
historical accuracy as we can get seek out of book or documentary. I
have no issue with a movie taking the overall tale that really happened
and tweaking it for narrative purposes, only when they insult the spirit
of the real people or make something so different that they might as
well have just made something original, to begin with. There is a scene
near the end which I know is completely fictitious but it’s fine because
it serves as a correct narrative climax. 

In the end,
things are said and we end on the black card with white text that reads
to us what happened afterward. These characters and this world never
really seems to come alive, striking cinematography and intricate
costumes and hair, but it’s all show. The elements for a good movie are
here, it just needs a breath of life within it.

Review Vice by Jonathan Evans

From the opening few minutes, we get a sense of what to expect from the rest of Vice. It opens with news footage of 9/11, the towers have been hit and are going down, then we have people in suits and in offices being guided around. In a safe space with no windows people are on phones and talking to each other trying to get a handle on the situation. One man, who is not the President, picks up the phone and tells the army that they are allowed to shoot down any planes they deem a threat. Then it cuts to black and the text appears, it reads out that this is a movie based on a real person, but also Dick Chaney is one of the most secretive modern politicians ever so there will be times when they embellish then it reads “But we did our fucking best!” So now we know that we are watching a movie based on a real-life man but because of the limited information they decided to absolutely go with their own thing and they apologise for nothing. 

When we first
meet Dick Chaney (after the opening scene previously mentioned) he is
driving home on a dirt country road with the sun beginning to rise, or maybe
set? A cop pulls him over and he is clearly very intoxicated and lights
up a cigarette. We then get helpful and playful narration in the form
of Jesse Plemons as Kurt the narrator.  Chaney started off as a no good
slacker that worked a blue-collar job, anything he could find, he got
into a good school but was kicked out because he was more interested in
drinking beer than attending class. But his girlfriend Lynne (Amy Adams)
that believes in him and want him to be a man of worth, he says that
he’ll never let her down again.

So years later he
goes back to school, get his diploma and is in Washington, when they
have their induction ceremony a man named Donald Rumsfeld (Steve Carell)
gives a speech about making sure you serve yourself, always align with
whoever the winner is and there’s no one taller than the last man
standing (well essentially this is what he says). Chaney asks what party
he is with and when he learns he’s with the Republican party he says
that his party. So under Rumsfeld’s tutilage Chaney rises through the
ranks and halts any decisions that most Liberals would vote for. Never
the less he gains power and works some of his family and friends into
his circle and every once in a while he gets a heart attack and reacts
to it like he has a bad knee that’s playing up again.

He
asks Trumble “What do we believe?” which is met with a hearty and long
laugh. What a concept, a politician who is there to serve the interest
of the people believing in something, ha! but over the course of the
movie it becomes a big recurring theme, there are many other figures
that they meet and in order to move forward with their career they will
have to put aside whatever their loved ones feel or what would hurt the
majority or even long times friends so they can get the next step. It
seems that, at least in this world of the movie or certainly these
characters we follow, none of these high profile, very powerful politicians believe in anything.  

Bale is known as an actor that truly dives deep into his characters to bring them to the screen, many times throughout his career he has drastically dropped or gained weight for a role. Sometimes to his doctor’s great worry. For this role, he almost definitely put on quite a bit of weight but also has great make-up team manipulating him to resemble the actual politician. He also adds the nice touches of having his characteristic left eye squint, raise of the right side of his mouth and shake of the head. He also has a great handle on the man’s voice, being able to manipulate it for whatever he needs for a scene, whether it be intimidating, slightly tender, menacing or relaxed. It is truly realised but also stylised performance.

Writer-director Adam McKay is not the person you would expect to handle this kind of material. He made his career on goof-ball comedies, probably most notably Anchorman. But he broke that chain with The Big Short and now seems to have a talent for penning dramatic material. Though to be sure there are laughs to be had to hear too. It is probably his experience with comedy that makes this movie so unique, A writer or director that specializes in this material would go for a flatter colour pallet, documentary feels and more reality-based dialog. McKay allows himself to be stylized and have a little more fun, taking the real people and styilizing them into charactures.

Vice tells a serious story in a funny way that is probably more memorable than any other more accurate obsessed bio that we could name about politicians. It seriously casts comedic actors for serious roles and serious actors to deliver absurd lines. It wants to do so much that you can eventually catch on that your being played with and we should probably double check all the “facts” presented in this movie. But it has such undeniable panache and enthusiasm you can’t help but be charmed. 

Review Dumbo (2019) by Jonathan Evans

“DUMBO, a major, major work. Yeah the perfect film, each sequence is totally self contained, totally complete and still pushes the picture forward.”

Sidney Lument, in conversation.

 out of 5 stars (3 / 5)

After rewatching the original DUMBO fairly recently I can attest to this statement. It is one of the most accessible and clear storytelling examples in cinema, every shot and emotion they intend to convey both from the characters and the scene rings perfectly clear.

So the question is “Why remake it?” The answer is, no real reason. really I guess I should end the review here but I should fully explain everything. A remake should take the ideas and feeling of the original but still make it it’s own thing or at least introduce some new elements and update it appropriately. But when you have something so timeless and so close to perfect your only real place to go is down.

So our story opens in 1919,
and two children, Milly (Nico Parker) and Joe (Finley Hobbins) they run
through a circus which is their home and run by Max Medici (Danny
DeVito) the ringleader and to the train station to their father Holt
(Colin Farrell) who’s back from the war, it cost him his left arm but
he’s happy to be home with his children, unfortunately his wife died
while he was away. You shouldn’t really care, the movie and the
characters don’t so let’s move on.

Medici has made an
investment, he bought a big elephant by the name of JUMBO, who is
expecting to give birth any day soon. One night she goes give birth and
the little baby emerges from hiding within a stack of hey. However, it
is not what they were expecting, because this baby has unusually large
ears. They do their best to cover them up but during one performance the
people see his ears and due to a rather clever accident with the sign
he gets named DUMBO. However, the children then learn that, with the
encouragement of a feather, his big ears can be used as wings, they have
a flying elephant, that’ll attract paying customers.

Being that DUMBO is an elephant and this is not a talking animal movie he is entirely silent throughout the movie, conveying his thoughts and emotions through his big blue eyes (this is how it should be). But being that they can’t let too much time go by without dialogue so we have two children explaining things to the audience and guiding him on his journey. This isn’t really necessary and these children just aren’t very good actors, they are either overacting or just being stonefaced throughout as well as their poor dialogue that flat-out, directly tells the audience everything.

Being that Tim Burton is
behind the camera I would expect one thing before anything else, a
strong visual flair. He brings that here, he has made a career out of
skeletons, clowns and theme parks. He sinks his visual teeth into these
images creating elaborate, slightly frightening and elaborate images
that make them seem like something more out of a fairytale than real
life.

One of the movies greatest strengths is also one of it’s greatest weaknesses and that is Michael Keaton as the villain V.A. Vandeverer.
Keaton made his name by working with Burton first in Beetlejuice then
in his two Batman movies. His career has made a resurgence recently with
Birdman and Spider-Man: Homecoming,
where he flexes his theatrical and sinister muscles like a man that
sells joyous wonder to the people while himself is only driven by greed
and narcissism. This character is a clique and is given lines that would
fit a forgettable villain during the nineties but even then he is able
to take them and make them wonderful zingers. However, no matter how
much Keaton elevates it, the question remains, why does DUMBO need a
villain? It’s DUMBO, one of the simplest stories ever told and was
devoid of a villain because it was not necessary, it was composed of the
problem of separation, not all this greed and contract complexities.
Plus some of his character’s decisions simply don’t make sense, in one
point in the movie everyone (including him) is given a chance to get
everything they want and he turns it down simply to be the villain. This
doesn’t make any sense, making a decision against the characters needs
is one thing but this would serve him too so whys would he do this? No
real reason, besides poor writing.

This wouldn’t really
be DUMBO without the inclusion of the Pink Elephant sequence. Well, to
be sure they do make an appearance but in their own unique way that is
quite stylized and fun (I’d be disappointed if it was mundane,
especially with Tim Burton behind the camera).

This movie is distinguishable from the original which shows that there are thinking independently. So far out of these movies, I would say the laziest is Beauty & The Beast. This is not a terrible movie and children will most likely be entertained and probably everyone will think the elephant is cute. But still, I have yet to see one of the remakes where I would say they improved on…well anything. For this movie, it’s not a waste of time but a much better use of it is to see the original again.R

Review Us by Jonathan Evans

 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Horror at it’s best and most profound is when it takes deep lurking insecurity within nearly everyone and fully realizes it through its images, colors, sounds and scenarios. In 2017, Jordan Peele made one of the greatest cinematic debut with Get Out, confident in its theme, refined in its layout and masterful in execution. Now he comes with his follow-up Us, about another base fear and brings his unique and refined vision to the table. 

Our
tale opens years ago, in the eighties. A little girl named Adelaide is
on vacation with her parents, they are in Santa Cruz on the beach and
enjoying the boardwalk, she wanders around and looks at the people and
the rides, her mother goes to the bathroom and her father plays a
shooting game and doesn’t pay her much attention so she wanders off by
herself. She wanders through the boardwalk, to the beach and then into a
hall of mirrors, inside she wanders and realizes she’s lost, she goes
for the exit but it is a mirror, she wanders and wanders and then has
her back to a mirror, only it isn’t a mirror because it turns and faces
her. There is another girl, that looks just like her, but is not her. 

Cut
then to years later and, we are in the present day and Adelaide has
grown up and is married with children. Her husband Gabe (Winston Duke),
daughter Zora (Shahadi Wright Joseph) and son Jason (Evan Alex). They
are going on one of their family vacations, to the same beach from that
night long ago, whatever happened there has clearly caused her great
trauma and is none too interested in going back. They meet their
“friends” the Tylers, Kitty (Elizabeth Moss) and Josh (Tim Heidecker)
along with their twin girls. 

One night while she
recounts the night in the hall of mirrors to Gabe, Jason comes in and
says “There’s a family standing in our driveway.” They go to take a look
and sure enough, there is, holding hands and just standing. Husband
tries to go out and start a conversation then tries intimidating them
but Adeline has a gut feeling that they mean harm and indeed they do.
One forces his way through the door and the others scurry around back,
they all gather in the living room with the fireplace on and in the
light they can see the intruders, they are them.  

Yes,
they have doublegangers, that look just like them but some are slightly
different and wear red jumpsuits, have one gloved hand and all carry
their own pair of uniquely shaped scissors. What do they want? To kill
them and take their lives for their own. Not the most complex motivation
but certainly a scary one.

There is very little fat
in this script. Peele constructs his scripts meticulously and
efficiently, years working as the comedy duo Key & Peele definitely
gave him a talent for efficient and clear writing. Almost no element of
what is introduced or said goes to waste, if a character has a hobby or a
bad habit then it will come into play in some way later in the movie. 

This
movies biggest success and biggest accomplishment is Lupita Nyong’o and
her performance as Adelaide. All the actors have to portray one
character and their double which are all brilliantly competent at.
Playing a regular person but then playing that person again, but moving
and reacting in an off way, which is fantastical mime acting. But
Nyong’o is able to take all these intense and subtle emotions that her
characters to go through and unifies them into her character, as well as
that she plays a twisted, disturbing presence that will most likely be
imitated for year to come, which her disturbing way of speaking by
breathing in and wide eyes that stare and never seem to blink and her
all too efficient way of walking that screams “Not right!” It is a
performance that would be great with just one of these characters, by
playing both it is a triumph.

In a horror movie,
the characters need to be afraid and convey that. If the characters
aren’t talking something seriously then we won’t. In an action movie,
you can have the hero blast monsters and face dire circumstances with a
stern look on their face throughout, but if the characters are faced
with something unnerving and are unfazed by it then we won’t engage with
it. These people are afraid but more than that they portray many facets
of fear. However, even with that, these are not just people that are
afraid throughout the movie, there are also a few laughs to be had.

Peele reunites with conductor Michael Abels to create another deep, memorable, unnerving score. Like with the last one he uses voice to invoke a deep, almost spiritual feeling within the movie but they are also singers that sing high pitched and in unison, this adds to the theme of double and the high pitched matches the strings which are sharp and shrieking, reminding us of both a scream and stabbing. Adding to the tension he will sometimes have one note continue on for too long, like a whistling kettle, giving the feeling of high pressure. 

Throughout
this movie, I was feeling everything the filmmaker wanted me to feel
while watching it. While the family were bantering and was laughing when
there’s a tense moment I was watching attentively and was horrified and
stimulated when the moments of fright were playing out. The only weak
link is the ending which makes sense poetically, but not logically, I
usually wouldn’t hold that against the movie but this was the one time I
was thinking “Wait, that doesn’t make any sense.” 

Bad horror is a cray loud guy with a hatchet. Great horror is surgen with a scalpel, knowing exactly where to cut and doing so with precision. Jordan Peele is a surgeon that cuts deep, efficiently and leaves us bleeding long afterward.

Series Review, Enid a Lucy, S4C by Gareth Williams

 out of 5 stars (4 / 5)

Writer Siwan Jones blends social realism and surrealist comedy in the most delightful way in Enid a Lucy. The S4C mini-series, which came to a slightly abrupt end on Sunday night, made for an entertaining and enjoyable drama. Termed the ‘Welsh Thelma and Louise’ by some, Eiry Thomas and Mabli Jên Eustace certainly provide plenty of laughs as the two leads whose offbeat road trip takes them from Llanelli to London via the most unconventional of routes.

The drama begins on a modest housing estate in Llanelli
where we meet next door neighbours Enid (Thomas) and Lucy (Jên). Enid is a piano
teacher whose home is neat and tidy, fitted with mod cons and well lit.
Meanwhile, Lucy lives in a dark, dank and messy space. The drained colour palette
of the cinematography, as well as the use of handheld camera, gives the
impression that this is going to be a gritty, class-based drama. The
introduction of Lucy’s drunken and abusive boyfriend Denfer (Steffan Cennydd),
in contrast with the genteel and traditional images of the Mother’s Union that
Enid is involved in, only serves to underline the divide that exists between
them. Yet early indications that this is going to be a serious piece of realist
drama are confounded by the end of the first episode when Enid turns getaway
driver for Lucy in order to escape the hapless Denfer and his buffoon of an
uncle, Sid (Nicholas McGaughey). What follows is a random and raucous
cat-and-mouse chase across the country as the men seek to reclaim a holdall
containing drugs and a gun from Lucy, who is determined to use the contents in
order to make a better life for her and her baby.

Siwan Jones’ script plays like a melody that is pitched just
below hard-hitting but doesn’t quite decrescendo into absolute farce. It manages
to deal with some big issues, such as childlessness and mental health, but
these never feel forced. Neither are they allowed to consume the overall
narrative, Jones ensuring that the escapades of Enid and Lucy are filled with
much hilarity and randomness. This includes perhaps the most comical scene of
the series, where two farmers that they end up staying with accidently take some
of the drugs in the holdall. Actors Ifan Huw Dafydd and Rhodri Evan really let
loose their inner zombie to produce a very funny scene. It borders on the
ridiculous but never descends into the realms of the unbelievable. It is this
kind of accurate measurement which Jones must be applauded for in the writing
of Enid a Lucy.

My only bone of contention with this drama was the finale. It was as if a timer had suddenly gone off with five minutes to go and all the loose ends had to be tied up tout suite. It left me feeling rather out-of-kilter; that such a well-paced journey should end so abruptly. Although not quite on the same level as the conclusion to BBC1’s The Replacement (2017), it nevertheless conjured up similar feelings. It is a shame because, otherwise, Enid a Lucy is a great drama, with particularly notable performances from Eiry Thomas and Mabli Jên Eustace. Thomas, in particular, slips into her character with ease here; in contrast to her over-exaggerated performance as the detective in Keeping Faith, she is completely believable as Enid. She is a joy to watch, especially during her exchanges with Eustace: the two bounce off one another wonderfully.

It is great to see S4C, via producers Boom Cymru, giving a prime-time platform to female writers at the start of 2019. Both Fflur Dafydd (35 Awr) and now Siwan Jones have provided Welsh audiences with some quality TV drama already this year. Enid a Lucy may have only received a short run, but it was fun whilst it lasted. Its slightly left-field style follows on from some of Jones’ previous work – not least 2011’s Alys – but it still feels highly original. It would have been great to have spent longer with these characters. Despite its rather hasty end though, Enid a Lucy still manages to thoroughly entertain.

Watch the series on S4C’s Clic here.

gareth

Review Fighting with My Family by Jonathan Evans

 out of 5 stars (5 / 5)

Let’s be honest, we know wrestling is fake, or at least scripted. But people buy into it because of the drama, conflict, and flash. We get invested in the narrative and the showmanship. Much like any other dramatic performance, we become engaged through the sincerity and all the flash and color just make it more interesting.

Fighting with my Family is another family drama movie about the pursuit of a dream but with the unique twist of populating it with characters that aren’t weird, but unconventional and rather rough around the edges. We open with a little boy watching wrestling on the TV, his sister changes the channel so she can watch Charmed, for this he puts her in a headlock, Dad (Nick Frost) walks in and does not break them up but instructs the boy on how to properly put her into a headlock, then Mother (Lena Headey) enters telling her to get out of it by herself. Both mum and dad are wrestlers and are heads of a local wrestling company, very low scale and just about getting by though they aren’t above doing some dodgy things to bring in some extra cash. Tonight they need an opening act so they get the kids to fight, she doesn’t want to but after they promise she’ll like it and it’s something for the family she does. While in the ring, and they are playing their parts and she hears the crowd cheer, she does indeed embrace the act of wrestling. Cut to years later and she has truly fallen in love with wrestling and is a screaming beast while in the ring.

Her name is Saraya
Knight (Florence Pugh) and she along with her brother Zak (Jack Lowden)
perform their family act in their local community center or gym,
wherever they can, and get by with what they have but dream of the big
time. They get others involved, Zak goes out into the town and brings in
the local kids the be a part of wrestling, it focuses them, builds up
their teamwork skills and keeps them away from drugs and other shady
activities. He even gets the boy from the neighborhood who’s blind into
the ring.

One night they get a call back from the
WWE (World Wrestling Entertainment) that they have reviewed the tapes
they’ve sent of Saraya and Zak in the ring and they’ve been called in to
audition and that could lead to training in California. 

Making
two very announced appearances in the movie is Dwayne ‘The Rock’
Johnson. Small independent movies have a tough time getting made so they
probably needed some kind of big name behind to get the financing.
Being that he is also the producer why not give him a place in the
story? As has been proved with his career in the ring and in front of
the movie camera he is a force of charisma, when he is on-screen it is a
delight. Both times he appears is for a crucial element of the plot so
it is not simply inserting an iconic celebrity to simply make the
audience that’s for fans gush but of structural importance to the
narrative. 

During the audition they are assisted by
Hutch Morgan (Vince Vaughn) that is strict, to the point and easily
throws around a few cutting remarks, but if they can’t handle this one
mans remarks how will they stand to have thousands of people screaming
obscenities and booing them? In the end, Saraya and only she goes
through the next round. So she has to go to California alone, but she
perseveres because this is for her family. 

Wrestling
training doesn’t just consist of getting toned, they need to learn how
to communicate between each other, what moves the other is doing and how
to appropriately roll with the punches and get in the right position to
take a fall or catch the other. If they don’t then one could break the
other’s nose or even cripple them. Also how to start the match by
talking smack to the other wrestler to get the crowd fired up and build
tension between their two characters, also how to deal with hecklers. 

Taking
on writing and directing duties is Stephen Merchant, most famous for
being Ricky Gervais writing partner on The Office, Extras and other
movies. He goes out on his own to make a movie purely that is his.
Writing is definitely is the strongest ability, being able to structure a
plot and infuse the characters with their unique voice and have one
scene start as a comedy and then into a serious moment. He is able to
make great use of visuals with the wide space of the stadium and some
nice visual gags.

This is a comedy, mostly. There
are some very funny moments in it but it also has deep cutting drama.
You get to know these people and how they’ve come together through
wrestling, how it’s redeemed then and they’ve hung their entire hopes
and dreams on hitting the big time and to be denied it is one of the
biggest blows they can ever face.

When the big fight came for the climax of the movie (which of course was gonna be the climax of this movie) I found that I was truly engaged in it. I knew that the characters themselves were in no real risk, these were professionals, but I cared about how hard it was for them to get to this point and what victory would mean to them. I was able to understand that it was performers but able to connect with the emotional journey happening and isn’t that what movies themselves are?!

Frankenstein: How To Make A Monster, Battersea Arts Centre by Tanica Psalmist

The production Frankenstein: How to Make a Monster is triumphantly spectacular! featuring an abundance of sensory flows from different types of beatboxers’ who all ecstatically project an aura of an overwhelming system, which conveys power and pain. Compellingly taking our ears through motions as their voices effortlessly, vigorously exploit numerous of in-depth frequencies from low to high simultaneously. Several of the beatboxers fluidity hypnotised us through their radio waves, leaving memorisation as they mind-blowingly touched on elements affiliated with political, mental and emotional conflict.

The beatboxers collectively integrated upbeats. In beat we witnessed a fusion of music genres from their voices alone, whether it be House, Funk, Blues, Motown or Pop this crew had it down to the ‘T’. Their music chords impressively merged heavy deep drums, string instruments and much more.

https://youtu.be/2gr-dNO6M_0

Incorporating Mary Shelley’s original, which was reimagined with soundscapes, sonic trickery and songs. To the counts within their musical flow, their vocal chords went to the rhythms of 1,2,3,4 but automatically speeded up to their heartbeats chanting 2,4,6,8. This soon boomed to a higher frequency as they began harmonising, synchronising, fluctuating and exploiting various other musical genres. The energy in the space became immense, especially when the space effectively transitioned into the vibes of an electrifying gig. 

Frankenstein had six acts in this play, all playing to their individual strengths whether it be singers, rappers, poetic essences and of course beatboxers; Frankenstein had it all! This production visually moved brains, you could feel the creatives hearts race, pumping to the counts of 10, 20, 30, and 40. Their sounds enhanced colourful patterns of different worlds colliding; projecting cinematic sounds of life and power whilst they embraced an emotional energy, triggered by a world we all know so well, as we become witnesses to the power of monsters all around us, strengthened by voices empowering them. 

The light moods had sparkles, gloss and smoke, the colours resembled energy, fire and enjoyment. This factor helped increase vibrations of radio-waves as they got even deeper into how to make a monster. The artistic designs were radiating meaning you couldn’t help but glance with amazement! 

Overall, Frankenstein gives you high adrenaline. A breathtaking, unforgettable and exceptionally enjoyable production! A fantastic experience for all to see, featuring beat box battles, audience immersive orchestra and childrens participation! A must see meticulous show with a talented team, you will not be disappointed!

Review – Les Misérables, August 012 By Eva Marloes

All images credit Eva Marloes

Please note images featured in this review are from the rehearsal process

This fun and moving adaptation of Victor Hugo’s Les Misérables by Cardiff-based theatre company August012 juxtaposes the battle of Waterloo and the Brexit Referendum. The intention behind the historical and literary parallel is to insert our daily lives into a wider perspective, to juggle the big and the small, the significant and insignificant, the past and the present. Les Mis, not the musical (thank God not the musical!), is a whirlpool of sound, words, and movement, expressing a sense of loss and futility, tempered by a feeling of compassion.

The scene begins with an account of the battle of Waterloo, cut by the recollections of Brits on holiday in Greece before the Referendum, and by the disbelief and shock at the result on the night. Away from formulaic narrative structure, Les Mis embraces a multilayered performance where music, words, and movement intersect and converge all around us. The music is spell-binding and plays a prominent role in guiding the audience into this tragi-comedy. It is a seductive and immersive experience that stirs the senses and brings awareness of the wider significance of Brexit.

The smell of grass, the thumping on the ground of the soldiers’ feet, broken by holiday-makers’ easy-going chatter and banter to the tune of Brazilian music in the sun-kissed beaches of Greece make the play at once seductive and moving. The charged atmosphere evoked by the battle is countered by the fun and ordinariness of the Referendum night. The parallel is sustained by local references to Cardiff’s roads and neighbourhoods. Napoleon is in Grangetown. Brussels is Ponty. Yet, the playfulness of Les Mis accentuates the brutality of Waterloo conveying a sense of awe, of something bigger than ourselves.

This heartfelt, engaging, ironic and exciting production articulates the current confusion, exhaustion, and ridiculousness of the aftermath of the Referendum. We don’t know what is going on. Les Mis has no comforting thesis, no tidy narrative, no solution, but a deliberate intention to throw off course.

At a time when over a million people have marched for a referendum on the deal, nearly six millions have signed a petition to revoke art.50, and when Parliament has rejected May’s deal and any other alternative, Les Mis captures the never-ending saga, the incomprehensible going around in circles, and the complexity of the present situation. Brexit has severe repercussions for peace in Northern Ireland, for EU citizens in Britain and British citizens in the EU, for Europe, and for Britain; yet its significance is drowned out in the daily drama deprived of substance. In all this, Les Mis wants its audience to wake up to the historical significance of our daily lives.

The play includes Nicola Sturgeon’s address to European nationals living in Scotland. In the endless noise produced by politicians on Brexit, European nationals in Britain are often forgotten and, at times, dismissed as ‘bargaining chips.’ Director Mathilde Lopez is a French-Spanish North African, who has lived and worked in Britain for 20 years and has a family with British composer/dj John Norton. Matteo Marfoglia, who choreographs the dancers, is an Italian national who has worked in the Netherlands and has been living in Wales for the past six years. For both Mathilde and Matteo the result of the Referendum brought the pain of exclusion. All of a sudden, their identity, status, and very presence in Britain were questioned.

Les Mis gives a voice to that sense of disorienting loss Europeans felt. There is no anger, no preaching, no pedantic history lecture. The political and philosophical rhetoric about the EU at the end is perhaps not as punchy and inspirational as it could have been, but it is genuine and moving. It gives voice to those in Britain who feel European and part of Europe and have been dismissed by mainstream media and politics not just for the past three years, but for decades. What is missing are perhaps the voices of  British politicians and thinkers who have dreamed of Europe, like John Stuart Mill, who joined Victor Hugo at the Congress of the League of Peace and Freedom in Geneva in 1867, where peace required a United States of Europe. I personally would have liked the inclusion of Hugos’ dream of a united Europe at the Peace Congress in Paris, in 1849.

‘A day will come when your arms will fall even from your hands! A day will come when war will seem as absurd and impossible between Paris and London, between Petersburg and Berlin, between Vienna and Turin, as it would be impossible and would seem absurd today between Rouen and Amiens, between Boston and Philadelphia. … A day will come when the only fields of battle will be markets opening up to trade and minds opening up to ideas. A day will come when the bullets and the bombs will be replaced by votes, by the universal suffrage of the peoples, by the venerable arbitration of a great sovereign senate’ 

Les Mis speaks of the hurt of those of us who feel deprived of Europe. Europe is no longer a dream, but a reality. There is an acceptance of defeat without despair, a search for strength in love, not distance. Les Mis appeals to faith, hope, and love. In opposition to the outside political message of exercising control and erecting borders, Les Mis, fruit of artists with diverse cultural backgrounds and political stances, celebrates friendship across divides. It calls on all of us to show compassion to one another.

What would Hugo make of this take on his work and, perhaps more crucially, what would he make of his own dream of a United States of Europe? He might be confused and excited to see that a Union of European countries has taken shape. He might feel inspired and hopeful that it is not just a philosophical, political, or religious idea, but a reality, clumsy and complex, but one that is increasingly in people’s hearts. This production of Les Mis, with its exuberant rhythms, poignant words, and passionate movements, lets us hear the heart of Europe beating.